Marked differences between MARC-145 cells and swine alveolar macrophages in IFNβ-induced activation of antiviral
1College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Abstract:
The activation of antiviral activity induced by recombinant swine interferon beta (rswIFNβ) against PRRSV was comparatively examined in MARC-145 cells and porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs). A dose-response analysis showed, in MARC-145 cells, that isolate Mo25544 was highly sensitive to rswIFNβ while a vaccine strain and isolate PDV130-9301 were resistant to different extents. In contrast, all three viruses were equally sensitive to rswIFNβ in PAMs even at the lowest dose of IFN utilized in the bioassays. To analyze potential differences in mechanisms of antiviral activation between these cells, treatment with 2-aminopurine (2-AP), an inhibitor of double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR), was performed in rswIFNβ-treated cells. Addition of 2-AP to rswIFNβ-primed MARC-145 cells restored replication of the Mo25544 isolate, and to some extent that of vaccine virus and PDV130-9301. In contrast, virus replication could not be rescued for any of the three viruses with 2-AP in rswIFNβ-treated PAMs. The differences in sensitivity of PRRSV to rswIFNβ as well as the effects of 2-AP strongly suggest that MARC-145 cells and PAMs utilize different rswIFNβ-associated antiviral pathways. Therefore, studies to understand virus-host cell interactions performed in MARC-145 cells require additional scrutiny when utilized as a host cell model for immunologic responses to PRRSV.
Insights
Porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs) and MARC-145 cells show different responses to recombinant swine interferon beta (rswIFNβ) against PRRSV. PAMs exhibit uniform sensitivity, while MARC-145 cells display variable sensitivity, indicating distinct antiviral pathways.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Virology
- Immunology
- Cell Biology
Background:
- Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) poses a significant threat to swine health.
- Interferons (IFNs) are crucial in antiviral defense, with swine interferon beta (swIFNβ) being a key component.
- Understanding cell-specific responses to IFN treatment is vital for effective PRRSV control strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comparatively analyze the antiviral activity of recombinant swine interferon beta (rswIFNβ) against PRRSV in two distinct porcine cell types: MARC-145 cells and porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs).
- To investigate the underlying mechanisms of antiviral activation by examining the role of double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR) using 2-aminopurine (2-AP).
Main Methods:
- Dose-response assays were conducted using rswIFNβ against PRRSV isolates in MARC-145 cells and PAMs.
- Treatment with 2-aminopurine (2-AP), a PKR inhibitor, was applied to rswIFNβ-primed cells to assess its effect on viral replication.
- Viral replication was quantified to determine sensitivity to rswIFNβ and the impact of PKR inhibition.
Main Results:
- MARC-145 cells demonstrated differential sensitivity to rswIFNβ, with one isolate being sensitive and others showing resistance.
- In contrast, all PRRSV isolates exhibited equal sensitivity to rswIFNβ in PAMs, even at low doses.
- 2-AP treatment partially restored viral replication in rswIFNβ-primed MARC-145 cells but failed to rescue replication in PAMs, indicating distinct antiviral pathways.
Conclusions:
- MARC-145 cells and PAMs utilize different rswIFNβ-associated antiviral pathways for PRRSV.
- The findings suggest that MARC-145 cells may not fully represent the immunologic response to PRRSV in vivo, necessitating cautious interpretation of studies using this cell line.
- Further research is needed to elucidate the specific mechanisms governing these cell-type-dependent antiviral responses.
More Related Videos
09:01An In vitro Model to Study Immune Responses of Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells to Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection
Published on: December 10, 2013
11:26Harvesting Murine Alveolar Macrophages and Evaluating Cellular Activation Induced by Polyanhydride Nanoparticles
Published on: June 8, 2012
