Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Protocol for Acute and Chronic Ecotoxicity Testing of the Turquoise Killifish Nothobranchius furzeri
Published on: April 24, 2018
Nonnative trout impact an alpine-nesting bird by altering aquatic-insect subsidies
Peter N Epanchin1, Roland A Knapp, Sharon P Lawler
1Graduate Group in Ecology, Department of Entomology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, USA. pnepanchin@berkeley.edu
Introduced trout in Sierra Nevada lakes drastically reduced aquatic insect subsidies, impacting Gray-crowned Rosy-Finch populations. Conservation must consider these indirect effects on recipient species.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Invasive Species Biology
- Conservation Biology
Background:
- Adjacent ecosystems are linked by resource subsidies, where more productive donor systems support consumers in less productive recipient systems.
- Introduced species can have direct impacts, but their indirect effects on cross-boundary subsidies are less understood.
- Gray-crowned Rosy-Finches (Leucosticte tephrocotis dawsoni) forage on aquatic insects emerging from Sierra Nevada lakes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the indirect effects of introduced trout on aquatic insect subsidies.
- To determine how introduced trout alter the foraging behavior of Gray-crowned Rosy-Finches in response to these subsidies.
- To assess the conservation implications of nonnative fish introductions on recipient species.
Main Methods:
- Compared aquatic insect abundance and Rosy-Finch foraging at fish-containing versus fishless alpine lakes in California.
- Quantified mayfly emergence as a key aquatic insect subsidy.
- Observed Rosy-Finch aggregative responses to insect availability.
Main Results:
- Fish-containing lakes had 98% fewer mayflies than fishless lakes, indicating trout outcompeted Rosy-Finches for this resource.
- Rosy-Finches showed a strong aggregative response, with 5.9 times more birds at fishless lakes.
- Introduced trout reduced both the magnitude of the insect subsidy and the strength of the trophic interaction.
Conclusions:
- Introduction of nonnative trout significantly diminishes aquatic insect subsidies vital for terrestrial consumers like Rosy-Finches.
- Reduced subsidies, particularly during the breeding season, may negatively impact Rosy-Finch populations.
- Conservation and restoration plans for alpine lake ecosystems should incorporate the recipient terrestrial communities dependent on aquatic subsidies.
More Related Videos
12:24Laboratory Estimation of Net Trophic Transfer Efficiencies of PCB Congeners to Lake Trout (Salvelinus namaycush) from Its Prey
Published on: August 29, 2014
03:50Effectiveness of the Air Stripping in Two Salmonid Fish, Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) and Brown Trout (Salmo Trutta Morpha fario)
Published on: September 16, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Threats to Biodiversity
Conservation of Declining Populations
Derivatives: Problem Solving
Frequency-dependent Selection
Limits to Natural Selection
Hybrid Zones