Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Case Studies

Case Studies

There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

Surveys

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...

Experimental Designs

Experimental Designs

An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...

Study Design in Statistics

Study Design in Statistics

A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Workplace health education: results from a national survey.

International quarterly of community health education·2010

Same author

Worker Training in Job Safety and Health: how do we know it Works?

International quarterly of community health education·2010

Same author

The evaluation of health and safety training.

International quarterly of community health education·2010

Same author

Education for job safety and health.

Health education quarterly·1988

Same author

Workplace health promotion/protection: correlates of integrative activities.

Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association·1987

Same author

Workplace health education: work group consensus, priorities and practices.

AAOHN journal : official journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses·1986

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

The "heartscore" program: a case study in limited evaluation.

M A Vojtecky¹, M A Vojtecky

¹Western Reserve Care System Youngstown, Ohio.

International Quarterly of Community Health Education

|September 16, 2010

Summary

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a leading cause of death in Youngstown, Ohio. The Heartscore program aims to reduce CHD by raising public awareness of controllable risk factors.

Area of Science:

Public Health
Cardiovascular Disease Prevention
Health Promotion

Background:

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death and disability in greater Youngstown, Ohio.
Regional CHD mortality rates exceed those in other parts of Ohio, indicating a critical public health need.
A community health promotion program, Heartscore, was developed to address this issue.

Purpose of the Study:

To describe the Heartscore program, a hospital-based initiative.
To outline the methods for a limited evaluation of Heartscore's screening components.
To demonstrate how evaluation data can refine interventions and improve CHD risk reduction.

Main Methods:

The Heartscore program involved 2,135 participants.
A limited evaluation focused on the screening aspects of the program due to resource constraints.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Data from screenings were collected and analyzed to inform program adjustments.

Main Results:

The evaluation provided useful insights despite resource limitations.
Information gathered is actively being used to enhance the Heartscore program.
Findings are guiding the development of more targeted interventions for CHD risk reduction.

Conclusions:

Limited evaluations can yield valuable data for program improvement.
Continuous refinement based on screening data is crucial for effective health promotion.
The Heartscore program demonstrates a practical approach to addressing regional CHD disparities.