Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
Obedience01:08

Obedience

According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation, obedience...
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mass media usage among black smokers: a first look.

International quarterly of community health education·2010
Same author

APACT: Its Organization and Impact on Resistance to U.S. Tobacco Imperialism.

International quarterly of community health education·2010
Same author

A multi-city community based smoking research intervention project in the african-american populatio.

International quarterly of community health education·2010
Same author

Typical activities of health educators in public and private settings in california.

International quarterly of community health education·2010
Same author

The secret health care system: guatemala 1988.

International quarterly of community health education·2010
Same author

Influence of american tobacco imports on smoking rates among women and youth in Asia.

International quarterly of community health education·2010
Same journal

A New Title, a New Focus: Community Health Equity Research and Policy.

International quarterly of community health education·2021
Same journal

Supports for Maternal Communication About Peer Pressure to Have Sex Among Puerto Rican Families.

International quarterly of community health education·2021
Same journal

Effects of Training on HIV Risk Perception, Knowledge and Sexual Behaviour Among Fisherfolks in Two Communities in North Central Nigeria.

International quarterly of community health education·2021
Same journal

Indiana Medical Resident's Knowledge of Surrogate Decision Making Laws.

International quarterly of community health education·2021
Same journal

Community Perception Regarding Mosquito-Borne Diseases in Some Selected Areas of Ganjam District of Odisha State, India.

International quarterly of community health education·2021
Same journal

"OMG, I Get Like 100 Teaspoons of Sugar a Day!" Rural Teens' Grasp of Their Beverage Consumption Habits.

International quarterly of community health education·2021
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Risk assessment-risk perception: who shall decide?

A E Winder1

  • 1University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

International Quarterly of Community Health Education
|September 16, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Determining acceptable environmental pollution levels involves balancing public safety and stakeholder interests. This article proposes a framework for making these critical health and safety decisions collaboratively.

More Related Videos

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Public Health Policy
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Public concern regarding environmental pollution and health safety has increased globally since the Chernobyl disaster.
  • A central debate exists on defining 'how safe is safe enough' and determining who decides.
  • This controversy involves private stakeholders, risk assessment technicians, and public perception of risk.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the fundamental question of acceptable safety levels in environmental pollution.
  • To explore the conflict between expert risk assessment and public perception/participation in policy decisions.
  • To propose a solution for fair and balanced decision-making on environmental safety.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the stakeholder conflict in environmental safety policy.
  • Examination of public perception versus expert risk assessment.
  • Development of a proposed framework for collaborative decision-making.

Main Results:

  • Identified a core controversy between private stakeholders/technicians and the public regarding risk assessment and policy influence.
  • Highlighted the public's desire for direct participation in decisions affecting their health and safety.
  • Proposed a universally relevant solution to bridge the gap between expert and public perspectives.

Conclusions:

  • A collaborative approach is necessary to establish acceptable environmental safety standards.
  • Fair and balanced decision-making requires integrating public values with scientific risk assessment.
  • The proposed solution aims to empower all stakeholders in environmental health and safety policy.