Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Automated Microbial Diagnostics01:24

Automated Microbial Diagnostics

Automated diagnostic analyzers have transformed clinical microbiology by providing rapid and reliable methods for pathogen identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Among these systems, the Vitek 2 is widely used because it automates the traditionally labor-intensive processes of microbial identification (ID) and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST), delivering standardized and timely results that are essential for effective patient care.Microbial Identification with ID CardsThe...
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting01:18

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting

The guidelines and strategies provided by the American Nurses Association (ANA) and the Canadian Nurses Association (CNA) offer essential principles for ensuring safe and secure computer charting systems in healthcare settings. Let's break down each recommendation:
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System01:30

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Generating synthetic multi-national longitudinal cohorts for clinically grounded HIV research.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Federated Learning Performance Depends on Site Variation in Global HIV Data Consortia.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Impact of US government funding freezes on the HIV response: findings from a rapid survey in 32 countries.

Health affairs scholar·2026
Same author

The implementation of tuberculosis preventive therapy in HIV care clinics in Africa, Asia and Latin America: a multiregional site survey.

BMJ global health·2026
Same author

Analysis approaches to combine error-prone data with a subset of validated data: an application to a multinational study of Kaposi sarcoma and HIV.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Limited user fees for adult HIV diagnosis and routine laboratory monitoring in the global IeDEA consortium: analysis in 42 countries.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025

Related Experiment Videos

Desiderata for a computer-assisted audit tool for clinical data source verification audits.

Stephany N Duda1, Firas H Wehbe, Cynthia S Gadd

  • 1Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA. stephany.duda@vanderbilt.edu

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
|September 16, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Clinical data auditing faces challenges with paper records and current software limitations. This study proposes attributes for a new computer-assisted tool to improve data quality and standardize audits.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Clinical research informatics
  • Health data management
  • Medical auditing

Background:

  • Clinical data auditing is crucial for validating research databases against source documents.
  • Existing data audit software lacks functionality for comparing databases with paper medical records.
  • Paper forms present significant limitations in clinical data audits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify weaknesses in paper-based clinical data audits.
  • To highlight shortcomings of current data audit software.
  • To propose essential attributes for a computer-assisted clinical data audit tool.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of audit team experiences with an international research consortium.
  • Enumeration of primary weaknesses in paper form usage for audits.
  • Identification of shortcomings in existing data audit software.

Main Results:

  • Paper forms are inefficient and prone to errors in clinical data audits.
  • Current software fails to adequately support audits involving paper source documents.
  • A need exists for specialized tools to bridge the gap between digital databases and paper records.

Conclusions:

  • Development of a computer-assisted clinical data audit tool is necessary.
  • Standardized attributes are proposed to guide the creation of such a tool.
  • The proposed tool aims to simplify and standardize the clinical data audit process, enhancing data quality.