Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
Properties of Enantiomers and Optical Activity02:24

Properties of Enantiomers and Optical Activity

It is essential to understand the difference between chiral and achiral interactions and the implications thereof in optical activity and their applications. Just as our feet, which are chiral, interact uniquely with chiral objects, such as a pair of shoes, but identically with achiral socks, enantiomers of a molecule exhibit different properties only when they interact with other chiral media. An example of a significant implication from this facet is the phenomenon known as optical activity,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The fundamentals of eye tracking, Part 7: Determining data quality.

Behavior research methodsยท2026
Same author

The frustration of a small <i>n</i>.

Perceptionยท2026
Same author

Blue or gold? Visual perception and the restoration of a Medieval painting.

Perceptionยท2026
Same author

Blink parameters are confounded by vertical eye orientation in video-based eye tracking: Comparing pupil- and eyelid-based methods.

Behavior research methodsยท2026
Same author

The fundamentals of eye tracking part 6: Working with areas of interest.

Behavior research methodsยท2026
Same author

The impact of the pupil size artifact on pupil-based eye-tracking data in reading tasks: Assessment and compensation.

Behavior research methodsยท2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker
05:48

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker

Published on: September 6, 2017

A dichoptic study of the oblique effect.

Tobias Borra1, Ignace T C Hooge, Frans A J Verstraten

  • 1Experimental Psychology Division, Helmholtz Institute, Universiteit Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 2, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands. t.borra@uu.nl

Perception
|September 17, 2010
PubMed
Summary

The oblique effect, a visual processing bias, is linked to perceived orientation, not retinal projection. This suggests the effect emerges after binocular fusion in vision.

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • The oblique effect demonstrates reduced sensitivity to oblique visual orientations compared to cardinal (horizontal/vertical) ones.
  • Understanding the basis of the oblique effect is crucial for visual neuroscience and understanding visual processing limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if orientation-matching acuity in binocular vision relies on retinal projection orientations or perceived stimulus orientation.
  • To investigate the locus of the oblique effect within the visual processing stream during binocular viewing.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a stereoscope to present stimuli with oblique retinal orientations but a perceived vertical orientation.
  • Employed an orientation-matching task to assess visual acuity under these specific conditions.

More Related Videos

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

Monocular Visual Deprivation and Ocular Dominance Plasticity Measurement in the Mouse Primary Visual Cortex
08:42

Monocular Visual Deprivation and Ocular Dominance Plasticity Measurement in the Mouse Primary Visual Cortex

Published on: February 8, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker
05:48

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker

Published on: September 6, 2017

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

Monocular Visual Deprivation and Ocular Dominance Plasticity Measurement in the Mouse Primary Visual Cortex
08:42

Monocular Visual Deprivation and Ocular Dominance Plasticity Measurement in the Mouse Primary Visual Cortex

Published on: February 8, 2020

Main Results:

  • Observer performance in orientation matching was predictable solely based on the perceived orientation of the stimulus.
  • Performance did not correlate with the oblique orientations of the retinal projections.

Conclusions:

  • The oblique effect in binocular viewing arises after the fusion of visual information from both eyes.
  • Perceived orientation, rather than retinal orientation, is the determining factor for the oblique effect in this context.