Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation01:16

Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation

The statistical interpretation of bioequivalence data is a significant aspect of pharmaceutical research. Bioequivalence refers to the absence of any significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredient in pharmaceutical products becomes available at the site of drug action when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions. This helps determine if different drug products have similar absorption rates, ensuring their interchangeability.Statistical...
Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment01:29

Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment

Product specifications define the acceptable quality of a pharmaceutical product by ensuring identity, purity, potency, and strength. These specifications serve as benchmarks during development, manufacturing, and post-approval quality control. Clinically relevant specifications are particularly important because they directly relate to a drug's safety and efficacy in clinical use.Dissolution studies are critical biopharmaceutic tools that link in vitro behavior to in vivo performance. They...
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence01:22

Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence

Generic intravenous (IV) drugs are considered bioequivalent to their branded counterparts due to their 100% bioavailability upon administration. However, variations in stability among different drug products can significantly influence their therapeutic performance, even if they are pharmaceutically equivalent.Cefuroxime, a prophylactic antimicrobial, is often used as a single-dose IV injection for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. A 3 g dose typically provides...
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy01:22

Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy

The potency of a drug is the measure of its ability to produce a biological response and can be compared by looking at the half-maximum effective concentration or EC50 values of different drugs. A lower EC50 value indicates higher potency of the drug. In the dose–response curve of two antihypertensive drugs, candesartan and irbesartan, a significant difference is observed in their EC50 values. A lower EC50 value for candesartan indicates that it is more potent than irbesartan, as it produces...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessment of clinical and neuroimaging efficacy of treatment targeting tau pathology in mild cognitive impairment and mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease with hydromethylthionine mesylate using external control data.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2026
Same author

Clinical, imaging and blood biomarker outcomes in a Phase 3 clinical trial of tau aggregation inhibitor hydromethylthionine mesylate in mild cognitive impairment and mild to moderate dementia due to Alzheimer's disease.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2026
Same author

Lecanemab appropriate use recommendations for clinical practice in the UK.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2025
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of pramipexole augmentation for acute phase and maintenance therapy of treatment-resistant depression compared to placebo augmentation: economic evaluation of the PAX-D randomised controlled trial.

The Lancet regional health. Europe·2025
Same author

Liraglutide in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: a phase 2b clinical trial.

Nature medicine·2025
Same author

Preharvest heat stress affects rocket salad leaf transcription and metabolism at harvest and after chilled postharvest storage.

Annals of botany·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

Determining the minimum clinically important differences for outcomes in the DOMINO trial.

Robert Howard1, Patrick Phillips, Tony Johnson

  • 1King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Old Age Psychiatry, London, UK. robert.j.howard@kcl.ac.uk

International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
|September 18, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Determining the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is crucial for interpreting dementia trial results. The DOMINO trial established MCIDs for sMMSE, BADLS, and NPI, providing valuable benchmarks for future research.

More Related Videos

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Dementia Research
  • Statistical Analysis

Background:

  • Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is vital for patient-relevant outcomes in dementia treatment trials.
  • Many dementia randomized controlled trials (RCTs) do not report MCIDs, or their observed differences fail to reach established thresholds.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine appropriate Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) values for key outcome measures in the DOMINO dementia trial.
  • To provide a transparent methodology for MCID determination in dementia research.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated expert opinion- and distribution-based values for MCID.
  • Triangulated data to establish MCIDs for Standardised Mini-mental State Examination (sMMSE), Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale (BADLS), and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI).
  • Used standard deviations (SD) of change scores from baseline, with investigators blinded to treatment allocation.

Main Results:

  • Established MCIDs of 1.4 points for sMMSE, 3.5 for BADLS, and 8.0 for NPI.
  • These values were derived from 0.4 of the SD of the change in score in the first 127 DOMINO participants.

Conclusions:

  • MCID values are essential for a comprehensive interpretation of dementia trial results.
  • Researchers should clearly report their methods for determining MCID values in dementia studies.