Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

The Stroke Preclinical Assessment Network Multi-Laboratory Model of Thromboembolic Stroke with Thrombolysis: TE-MCAo
Published on: December 19, 2025
Is intravenous thrombolysis useful in carotid artery dissection with tandem occlusion?
Montserrat González Delgado1, Raquel García, Eduardo Murias
1Neurology Service, Central University Hospital of Asturias, Oviedo, Spain. mglezdelgado@yahoo.es
Insights
Intravenous thrombolysis is safe for cervical artery dissection patients. Even with tandem lesions, like internal carotid artery occlusion and middle cerebral artery embolus, this treatment can lead to successful recanalization and good outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Vascular Neurology
- Interventional Neurology
Background:
- Cervical artery dissection (CAD) is a significant cause of stroke in young adults.
- Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) has traditionally been a contraindication in CAD due to concerns about worsening dissection or hemorrhage.
- Recent evidence suggests IVT may be safe and effective in select CAD cases.
Observation:
- A case of a patient presenting with occlusive internal carotid artery (ICA) dissection and a concurrent middle cerebral artery (MCA) embolus is described.
- The patient exhibited collateral circulation via the ophthalmic artery and anterior communicating artery.
- The patient successfully underwent IV thrombolysis.
Findings:
- Successful recanalization of the MCA was achieved following IV thrombolysis.
- The patient experienced a good clinical outcome.
- Tandem lesions in CAD, specifically ICA occlusion with MCA occlusion, do not preclude successful IVT.
Implications:
- IV thrombolysis is a viable treatment option for acute ischemic stroke secondary to cervical artery dissection, even in the presence of tandem occlusions.
- The presence of robust collateral circulation may predict successful recanalization in MCA emboli associated with CAD.
- Further research is warranted to establish definitive guidelines for IVT in complex CAD presentations.
Abstract:
Cervical artery dissection no longer represents an obstacle for performing intravenous (IV) thrombolysis. This treatment can be used safely for patients with cervical artery dissection, but tandem lesions may be related to poor outcome. We report a patient with an occlusive internal carotid artery (ICA) dissection and middle cerebral artery (MCA) embolus, with collateral circulation through the ophthalmic artery and communicating anterior artery. He underwent IV thrombolysis, with subsequent MCA recanalization and good outcome. In cases of tandem lesions in cervical artery dissection with MCA occlusion, IV thrombolysis is indicated despite the presence of ICA occlusion. Due to the presence of collateral circulation and the composition of the embolus, recanalization of MCA might be possible.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Transient Ischemic Attack l: Introduction
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
