Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients
Published on: February 6, 2021
Civil commitment outcomes of incompetent defendants
Gwen A Levitt1, Illa Vora, Kelly Tyler
1Department of Psychiatry, Maricopa Integrated Health System and Maricopa County Superior Court, Phoenix, AZ, USA. glevitt@cox.net
Abstract:
In Maricopa County, Arizona, most defendants who are found not competent and not restorable (NCNR) are admitted involuntarily to an acute-care inpatient hospital. Many of these patients would most likely not have met the State's usual admission criteria for acute inpatient care had they not been evaluated in relation to a criminal offense. Is this group treated differently from their peers who are not involved in the criminal justice system? We examined records for 293 NCNR admissions, retrospectively, to assess their admission status and the outcomes of their commitment. We compared them to 280 matched cases of patients admitted involuntarily from the community (non-NCNR). The NCNR group met fewer admission criteria and received court-ordered treatment (COT) 22 percent more often than did the non-NCNR patients. The NCNR patients had longer hospital stays despite being found less dangerous to themselves or others than the community sample. Results suggest that NCNR individuals are treated differently from non-NCNR patients.
Related Concept Videos
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Obedience
Torts II
Intellectual Disability

