Directed forgetting shares mechanisms with attentional withdrawal but not with stop-signal inhibition
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
Published on: July 5, 2015
Jonathan M Fawcett1, Tracy L Taylor
1Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. jmfawcet@dal.ca
Abstract:
To explore the mechanisms underlying the ability to intentionally forget, the present study combined an item-method directed forgetting paradigm with tasks that measure stop-signal inhibition (Experiments 1 and 2) and inhibition of return (IOR; Experiment 2). Following each study-phase instruction to remember (R) or forget (F), a target was presented centrally (Experiment 1) or to the left or right in the visual periphery (Experiment 2); the target required a speeded response that was sometimes countermanded by a central stop signal. Although stop-signal reaction times were unaffected by the preceding memory instruction (or relationship with word-target location), F instructions improved stopping and delayed responses. Replicating previous findings in the literature, significant IOR was observed following F instructions but not following R instructions (Experiment 2). These findings suggest that intentional forgetting is an active cognitive process that more likely engages attentional mechanisms related to orienting than those related to stop-signal inhibition.
Related Concept Videos
Forgetting
Encoding...
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Long-term Depression
Long-term Depression
Calcium Ion Concentration Mechanism
If over time, all...

