Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

Surveys

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.

Factors Affecting Workability

Factors Affecting Workability

The workability of concrete is a critical characteristic that influences the ease of mixing, handling, and finishing the concrete. It is affected by several factors including water content, aggregate properties, and admixtures like air entrainment. Water plays a fundamental role as it lubricates the concrete mix, facilitating easier movement and placement. However, the water requirement varies depending on the texture and shape of aggregates. Finer particles and angular, rough-textured...

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...

Nursing Implementation

Nursing Implementation

Implementation is the execution of the nursing care plan developed during the planning phase.
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided-fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of lymphoma of the pancreas: A clinicopathological study of nine cases.

Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology·2017

Same author

Evaluating the English language scientific writing skills of Saudi dental students at entry level.

Eastern Mediterranean health journal = La revue de sante de la Mediterranee orientale = al-Majallah al-sihhiyah li-sharq al-mutawassit·2016

Same author

Aluminum nitride nanowire light emitting diodes: Breaking the fundamental bottleneck of deep ultraviolet light sources.

Scientific reports·2015

Same author

Clinical skills assessment: comparison of student and examiner assessment in an objective structured clinical examination.

Education for health (Abingdon, England)·2011

Same author

Enhanced production and characterization of a beta-glucosidase from Bacillus halodurans expressed in Escherichia coli.

Biochemistry. Biokhimiia·2010

Same author

Molecular cloning, characterization, and expression studies of water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) somatotropin.

Biochemistry. Biokhimiia·2007

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Factors that affect implementation of web-based faculty evaluation forms: residents' perspectives from a developing

S H Ibrahim¹, S K Ali, S Sadaf

¹Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Education for Health (Abingdon, England)

|September 21, 2010

Summary

Technical issues and time constraints hinder resident participation in web-based faculty evaluations. Addressing these, alongside focused training and support, can improve submission rates for this important feedback system.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Medical Education Research
Health Professions Education
Digital Health Systems

Background:

A web-based faculty evaluation system was piloted in four residency programs.
Participation rates varied significantly, with one program exceeding 70% submission and others below 50%.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the reasons behind differential participation rates in the web-based faculty evaluation system.
To identify barriers and facilitators for resident engagement with the system.

Main Methods:

A qualitative approach using focus group discussions (FGDs) with residents from all training years.
Discussions aimed to explore perceptions, problems, and concerns regarding the online evaluation system.

Main Results:

Technical difficulties with form completion and submission were primary deterrents.
Lack of accessible technical support and the time burden of evaluations were significant limiting factors.
Residents recommended departmental orientation sessions for the new system.

Conclusions:

Enhancing resident confidence and support is crucial for improving participation in web-based evaluations.
Solutions include focused orientation, reinforcement, reminders, confidentiality assurances, and technical issue resolution.