A multicenter interventional program to reduce the incidence of anal sphincter tears
Elisabeth Hals1, Pål Øian, Tiina Pirhonen
1From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University Hospital of Northern Norway/University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway; The Norwegian Continence and Pelvic Floor Center, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway; the National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland; the Nordic School of Public Health, Gothenburg, Sweden; and the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway; Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; and Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo Norway.
Objective:
In Norway, we have experienced a gradual increase in the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries from under 1% in the late 1960s to 4.3% in 2004. This study was aimed to assess whether an interventional program causes a decrease in the frequency of anal sphincter tears.
Methods:
In all, 40,152 vaginal deliveries between 2003 and 2009 were enrolled in the interventional cohort study from four Norwegian obstetric departments. The focus of the intervention was on manual assistance during the final part of the second stage of labor. Data were analyzed in relation to occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter tears.
Results:
The proportion of parturients with anal sphincter tears decreased from 4-5% to 1-2% during the study period in all four hospitals (P<.001). The tears associated with both noninstrumental and instrumental deliveries decreased dramatically. The number of patients with grades 3 and 4 anal sphincter ruptures decreased significantly, and the reduction was most pronounced in grade 4 tears (-63.5%) and least in 3c tears (-47.5%) (both P<.001). The number of episiotomies increased in two hospitals but remained unchanged in the other two. The lowest proportion of tears at the end of the intervention (1.2% and 1.3%, respectively) was found in the two hospitals with an unchanged episiotomy rate.
Conclusion:
The multicenter intervention caused a highly significant decrease in obstetric anal sphincter injuries.
Level Of Evidence:
II.
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care

