Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Relative Risk

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...

Hazard Rate

Hazard Rate

The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...

Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate

Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate

Assessment of Ventilation
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:

Hazard Ratio

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...

Assessment of Respiration

Assessment of Respiration

The respiratory system's basic structures and primary functions lay the foundation for nurses' comprehensive respiratory assessments. This assessment includes subjective and objective data to gauge the patient's respiratory health.
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like asthma or COPD,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Wrong-site surgeries are preventable.

Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·2007

Same author

The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: a standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2005

Same author

All outcomes should be disclosed.

Joint Commission journal on quality and safety·2003

Same author

Are more reports better?

Joint Commission journal on quality and safety·2003

Same author

Proactive risk reduction: how it works.

Trustee : the journal for hospital governing boards·2003

Same author

Clarifying JCAHO's alarm-safety goal. A conversation with Richard J. Croteau, MD.

Health devices·2003

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Risk assessing risk assessment.

Richard J Croteau

Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

|September 24, 2010

Summary

Proactive risk assessment methods can effectively identify and manage risks. However, evaluating the risk assessment process itself is crucial for ensuring its success and avoiding potential failures.

Area of Science:

Risk management
Process evaluation
Decision science

Background:

Proactive risk assessment (PRA) methods are designed to identify and manage potential hazards.
Effective PRA can lead to efficient and rewarding outcomes for stakeholders involved.
Despite their benefits, PRA methods can encounter failures, necessitating further scrutiny.

Discussion:

The efficacy of PRA hinges on its successful implementation and execution.
Failures in PRA suggest a need to analyze the underlying processes and methodologies.
Risk assessment of the risk assessment process (RARAP) offers a meta-level approach to enhance PRA.

Key Insights:

RARAP can identify systemic weaknesses within PRA frameworks.
Implementing RARAP can improve the reliability and accuracy of risk identification and management.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

A systematic review of PRA processes is essential for continuous improvement.

Outlook:

Future research should focus on developing standardized RARAP methodologies.
Integrating RARAP into existing risk management frameworks can bolster overall safety and efficiency.
The adoption of RARAP promises more robust and dependable risk mitigation strategies.