Receptor conversion in distant breast cancer metastases

Laurien D C Hoefnagel1, Marc J van de Vijver, Henk-Jan van Slooten

  • 1Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Breast Cancer Research : BCR
|September 25, 2010
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Receptor conversion in breast cancer metastases is uncommon for ERα and HER2 but more frequent for PR, particularly in liver, brain, and gastro-intestinal sites. This finding impacts systemic treatment choices for advanced breast cancer.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pathology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Systemic treatment for metastatic breast cancer relies on primary tumor characteristics (ERα, PR, HER2).
  • Immunophenotype differences between primary tumors and metastases ('receptor conversion') can lead to suboptimal treatment.
  • Previous studies on receptor conversion were limited by small sample sizes and suboptimal methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the frequency and patterns of receptor conversion for ERα, PR, and HER2 in a large cohort of distant breast cancer metastases.
  • To compare receptor status between primary tumors and their corresponding metastases using standardized IHC and ISH methods.
  • To provide data that may inform clinical practice regarding treatment selection for metastatic breast cancer.

Main Methods:

  • Analyzed 233 distant breast cancer metastases (skin, liver, lung, brain, GI) and their primary tumors.
  • Performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) for ERα, PR, and HER2 on all samples.
  • Utilized HER2 in situ hybridization (ISH) for cases with IHC conversion or equivocal results.

Main Results:

  • Receptor conversion rates (10% threshold) were 10.3% for ERα and 30.0% for PR.
  • HER2 conversion occurred in 5.2% of cases.
  • PR conversion was significantly more frequent in liver, brain, and GI metastases compared to other sites.

Conclusions:

  • Receptor conversion is a documented phenomenon in distant breast cancer metastases.
  • ERα and HER2 conversion are relatively uncommon, while PR conversion is more frequent.
  • The observed conversion rates, particularly for PR, highlight the need for careful consideration in selecting systemic therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer.