Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Insurance-associated disparities in hospitalization outcomes of Michigan children
Thomas H Peterson1, Tom Peterson, Carl Armon
1Department of Quality, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. tom.peterson@spectrum-health.org
Insights
Children with public or no health insurance in Michigan experienced worse hospitalization outcomes and higher costs than those with private insurance. This highlights significant disparities in pediatric healthcare access and quality.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Health Outcomes
- Health Services Research
- Health Insurance Disparities
Background:
- Understanding healthcare disparities is crucial for improving pediatric care.
- Insurance status significantly impacts health outcomes for children.
- Previous research indicates potential inequities in access to care based on insurance type.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare hospitalization outcomes for Michigan children based on insurance status.
- To identify differences in admission rates and emergency room usage between insured and uninsured/publicly insured children.
- To assess the financial implications of these disparities.
Main Methods:
- Population-based analysis of Michigan inpatient records (2001-2006).
- Stratification of hospitalization rates by age, disease, and insurance status (private, public/none).
- Utilized Michigan Inpatient Database and US Census population estimates.
Main Results:
- Children with public/no insurance had higher overall and ambulatory-sensitive condition admission rates.
- These children were more likely to be admitted via the emergency room.
- Higher per-child hospital charges for the public/no insurance group, with estimated excess charges of $309.8-$401.8 million in 2006.
Conclusions:
- Significant disparities exist in hospitalization outcomes and costs for Michigan children based on insurance.
- Children with public or no insurance face poorer health outcomes.
- Addressing these disparities presents an opportunity to enhance healthcare efficiency and effectiveness.
Objective:
To investigate whether children in Michigan with private insurance have better hospitalization-related outcomes than those with public or no insurance.
Study Design:
Population-based hospitalization rates were calculated for newborns and children aged <18 years in Michigan for the years 2001-2006 and stratified by age, disease grouping, and health insurance status using inpatient records from the Michigan Inpatient Database and population estimates from the US Census Current Population Survey.
Results:
Michigan children with public/no insurance had significantly higher overall hospital admission rates and admission rates for ambulatory-sensitive conditions, and were more likely to be admitted through the emergency room, compared with those with private health insurance. Similarly, newborns with public/no insurance had significantly higher rates of hospitalization-related outcomes. Hospital charges per child were higher in the public/no insurance population, translating to potential excess charges of between $309.8 and $401.8 million in 2006.
Conclusions:
There are disparities in health outcomes and charges between Michigan children and newborns with public/no insurance and those with private health insurance, presenting a significant opportunity to improve the efficiency and efficacy of care.
