Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Cost-Efficient Transcriptomic-Based Drug Screening
Published on: February 23, 2024
A dynamic perspective on pharmaceutical competition, drug development and cost effectiveness.
Rodrigo Refoios Camejo1, Clare McGrath, Ron Herings
1Pfizer Inc., Surrey, UK. rodrigo.refoioscamejo@pfizer.com
Arbitrary cost-effectiveness (CE) thresholds may hinder efficient drug research and development (R&D). Incorporating disease-specific factors into CE decision-making is crucial for fostering innovation and ensuring access to valuable treatments.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Pharmaceutical Policy
- Innovation Studies
Background:
- Healthcare payers implement policies to optimize drug spending and achieve allocative efficiency.
- Cost-effectiveness (CE) thresholds link pharmaceutical prices to therapeutic value, defining acceptable incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).
- Factors like increasing comparator effectiveness, decreasing drug prices, rising R&D costs, and shorter patent lives impact drug innovation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the impact of general cost-effectiveness thresholds on pharmaceutical R&D investment.
- To identify potential inefficiencies and lost clinical value resulting from arbitrary threshold policies.
- To propose adjustments to CE decision rules for better accommodation of innovation dynamics.
Main Methods:
- Economic modeling of drug R&D investment under varying market conditions and pricing regulations.
- Analysis of the relationship between R&D costs, patent exclusivity, and the establishment of CE thresholds.
- Simulation of innovation curves under different policy scenarios.
Main Results:
- A general, arbitrary CE threshold can disincentivize efficient R&D, leading to premature withdrawal of investment.
- Optimal innovation points may not be reached, potentially resulting in the loss of affordable, clinically effective treatments.
- The rate of R&D and innovation varies significantly across different disease areas.
Conclusions:
- Disease-specific characteristics must be considered in CE decision-making to accurately reflect innovation realities.
- Adopting a one-size-fits-all approach to CE thresholds can be detrimental to pharmaceutical innovation.
- Tailored CE policies are essential for balancing healthcare budgets with the need for novel drug development.
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics: Overview
Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview
The pharmaceutical phase focuses on leveraging the physicochemical properties of the drug to design and manufacture an effective product. Variants include orally administered tablets or capsules, topical creams or ointments, and parenteral-delivery solutions or emulsions.
The pharmacokinetic phase...
Biopharmaceutical Factors Influencing Drug Product Design: Overview
Pharmacodynamics: Overview and Principles
Most drugs' effects result from their interactions with drug receptors or targets within the body. These interactions trigger specific responses at the cellular or systemic level. Drug receptors can be found on the surfaces of cells or within...
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems
