Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quantitative Analysis01:12

Quantitative Analysis

1.5K
Quantitative analysis is a technique for measuring the amount of specific constituents in a sample. When the sample's composition is unknown, qualitative analysis is performed first to identify its components, which ensures that the correct substances are measured during the quantitative phase.
In quantitative analysis, two key measurements are made: the sample quantity and a property proportional to the amount of the analyte (the substance being analyzed). This forms the basis of the...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.7K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.7K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.5K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
1.5K
G-protein Coupled Receptors01:21

G-protein Coupled Receptors

132.1K
G-protein coupled receptors are ligand binding receptors that indirectly affect changes in the cell. The actual receptor is a single polypeptide that transverses the cell membrane seven times creating intracellular and extracellular loops. The extracellular loops create a ligand specific pocket which binds to neurotransmitters or hormones. The intracellular loops holds onto the G-protein.
132.1K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.5K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.5K
Couple01:29

Couple

1.0K
A couple is a pair of parallel forces equal in magnitude but in opposite directions. The forces are separated by a perpendicular distance, known as the couple's arm. The couple causes a rotation force or moment that rotates the body about an axis perpendicular to the plane of the forces. The resulting moment is referred to as the couple moment. The SI unit of a couple moment is the Newton-meter (N-m).
A typical example to understand this concept is tightening a bolt with a lug wrench. A...
1.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Decoding fibrosis: Transcriptomic and clinical insights via AI-derived collagen deposition phenotypes in MASLD.

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)·2026
Same author

Weak-to-strong generalization enables fully automated training of multi-head mask-RCNN model for segmenting densely overlapping cell nuclei in multiplex whole-slice brain images.

Frontiers in bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Accuracy of Diagnosis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms With Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis (MPN-SVT).

American journal of hematology·2026
Same author

Enhancing liver fibrosis measurement: Deep learning and uncertainty analysis across multi-center cohorts.

Journal of pathology informatics·2026
Same author

Self-Supervised Voxel-Level Representation Rediscovers Subcellular Structures in Volume Electron Microscopy.

Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Workshops·2026
Same author

Short Trajectory Segmentation With 1D Unet Framework: Application To Secretory Vesicle Dynamics.

Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging·2026
Same journal

ContiMorph: An unsupervised learning framework for cardiac motion tracking with time-continuous diffeomorphism.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

MedP-CLIP: Medical CLIP with region-aware prompt integration.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

Multi-organ guided diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment via hierarchical alignment and knowledge distillation.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

SUDA: Simultaneous unsupervised knowledge distillation and adaptation of foundation models for efficient pathological image analysis.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

Beyond the LUMIR challenge: The pathway to foundational registration models.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

Annotation-efficient medical image segmentation via cross-latent graphs and vector-quantized memory.

Medical image analysis·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Evaluation of Polymeric Gene Delivery Nanoparticles by Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis and High-throughput Flow Cytometry
08:51

Evaluation of Polymeric Gene Delivery Nanoparticles by Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis and High-throughput Flow Cytometry

Published on: March 1, 2013

16.7K

Coupled minimum-cost flow cell tracking for high-throughput quantitative analysis.

Dirk Padfield1, Jens Rittscher, Badrinath Roysam

  • 1GE Global Research, One Research Circle, Niskayuna, NY 12309, USA. padfield@research.ge.com

Medical Image Analysis
|September 25, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel graph-theoretic cell tracking algorithm for high-throughput screening. The method accurately monitors individual cells, including complex behaviors, with over 99% accuracy.

More Related Videos

A Quantitative Evaluation of Cell Migration by the Phagokinetic Track Motility Assay
11:30

A Quantitative Evaluation of Cell Migration by the Phagokinetic Track Motility Assay

Published on: December 4, 2012

14.3K
A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow
11:39

A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow

Published on: August 13, 2012

15.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Evaluation of Polymeric Gene Delivery Nanoparticles by Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis and High-throughput Flow Cytometry
08:51

Evaluation of Polymeric Gene Delivery Nanoparticles by Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis and High-throughput Flow Cytometry

Published on: March 1, 2013

16.7K
A Quantitative Evaluation of Cell Migration by the Phagokinetic Track Motility Assay
11:30

A Quantitative Evaluation of Cell Migration by the Phagokinetic Track Motility Assay

Published on: December 4, 2012

14.3K
A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow
11:39

A Quantitative Fitness Analysis Workflow

Published on: August 13, 2012

15.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cell biology
  • Bioimage analysis
  • Computational biology

Background:

  • Automated cell monitoring is crucial for high-throughput, high-content screening.
  • Existing cell tracking methods are often complex, require extensive post-processing, and are parameter-intensive.
  • Accurate tracking of individual cells with diverse behaviors (mitosis, merging, movement) is challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a general, consistent, and extensible cell tracking approach.
  • To model complex cell behaviors within a graph-theoretic framework.
  • To improve accuracy and efficiency in automated cell tracking for biological studies.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a graph-theoretic framework to model cell tracking, explicitly incorporating mitosis and merging events.
  • Extended the minimum-cost flow algorithm using a coupling operation on graph edges.
  • Employed a wavelet-based approach for accurate cell denoising and segmentation, even in low contrast-to-noise images.
  • Integrated microscope defocusing and stage shift correction into the framework.
  • Applied linear programming for efficient graph solution to optimize tracking constraints and costs.

Main Results:

  • The algorithm achieved over 99% accuracy in segmenting and tracking cells across diverse datasets.
  • Successfully detected various cell behaviors, including mitosis and merging.
  • Demonstrated robustness on nearly 6000 images, analyzing approximately 400,000 cells and 32,000 tracks.
  • The wavelet-based segmentation effectively handled low contrast-to-noise conditions.

Conclusions:

  • The developed graph-theoretic framework provides a robust and accurate solution for automated cell tracking.
  • This approach overcomes limitations of existing methods by simplifying post-processing and parameterization.
  • Enables precise quantitative analysis of cell events, offering a valuable tool for high-throughput biological research.