Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the anti-Müllerian hormone signalling pathway do not determine high or low...

There is substantial variability in ovarian response to exogenous gonadotrophins in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF. Genetic variation in signalling pathways of the ovary could influence ovarian stimulation outcome. Studies have shown a correlation between the serum concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and ovarian stimulation outcome. This paper present a retrospective case-controlled genetic association study designed to test the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the AMH signalling pathway and two clinically important outcomes of ovarian stimulation: low and high response. Blood samples from 53 high responders, 38 low responders and 100 controls were analysed for eight SNP of interest. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by a binary logistic regression model adjusting for age and body mass index. As far as is known, this is the first report on the influence of these SNP, present in approximately 19% of women, on ovarian stimulation outcome. No statistically significant association was found between any of the SNP studied and high or low response to ovarian stimulation. It seems unnecessary to detect these SNP when applying the serum concentration of AMH as a predictor of ovarian response to stimulation. Many infertile couples are treated by IVF. Part of this treatment is to pharmacologically stimulate the ovaries to develop many oocytes simultaneously. This process is called ovarian stimulation. Some women respond either too little (low responders) or too much (high responders) to ovarian stimulation. Both these situations are unfavourable to the woman. This study evaluates whether these chances of having one of these two outcomes of ovarian stimulationare influenced by variation in the gene for anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) or its receptor. This is done by taking blood samples from three groups of patients: low responders, high responders and controls with a normal response. These blood samples were analysed to see if the variation in the genes for AMH or its receptor were different in the three groups. They were not, and so we conclude that the genetic variation that exists in the AMH and receptor signalling pathway is not a major determinant of ovarian stimulation outcome.