Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026
07:52
Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability
Published on: September 18, 2020
[Postural control depends on testing situation].
Stephan Turbanski1, Ditmar Schmidtbleicher
1Abteilung Bewegungs- und Trainingswissenschaften am Institut für Sportwissenschaften, Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main. turbanski@sport.uni-frankfurt.de
Summary
Static posturography has limited value in predicting dynamic balance control. Dynamic testing is more suitable for assessing postural stability and preventing injuries or falls.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Human Movement Science
- Neurology
Context:
- Postural control is commonly assessed using static posturography.
- The clinical utility of static assessments for predicting dynamic balance capabilities remains unclear.
Purpose:
- To evaluate correlations and differences between static posturography and dynamic testing situations.
- To determine the informative value of static testing for dynamic conditions.
Summary:
- This study compared postural control in static (force platform) and dynamic (movable plate) conditions in 40 healthy adults.
- Results showed marginal correlations between static and dynamic performance, with significant changes in EMG activity and coordination patterns.
- Different postural control strategies were observed between static and dynamic testing situations.
Impact:
- Static posturography may not accurately predict performance in dynamic situations that pose fall or injury risks.
- Dynamic testing appears more suitable for comprehensive postural control assessment.
- Findings question the generalizability of postural control as an ability.
