Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
Cross-modal distraction by background speech: what role for meaning?
1School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom. MarshJE@cardiff.ac.uk
Irrelevant speech disrupts mental tasks, especially those relying on meaning. Semantic features of ignored speech interact with task demands, influencing recall and fluency. Source monitoring also plays a role.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Auditory Perception
- Memory Research
Background:
- Concurrent irrelevant speech is known to disrupt cognitive tasks.
- Existing theories primarily explain effects in serial recall tasks.
- The impact of irrelevant speech on meaning-based retrieval remains less understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To extend the 'interference by process' framework to meaning-based verbal tasks.
- To investigate how semantic characteristics of irrelevant speech affect retrieval.
- To explore the role of source monitoring in irrelevant speech effects.
Main Methods:
- Experimental design involving free recall, category-clustering, and fluency tasks.
- Manipulation of semantic relatedness between irrelevant speech and focal task content.
- Analysis of disruption levels based on semantic features and task demands.
Main Results:
- Semantic features of irrelevant speech significantly interact with semantic retrieval in focal tasks.
- Disruption levels vary across free recall, category-clustering, and fluency tasks.
- Source monitoring deficits partially explain the observed interference from irrelevant speech.
Conclusions:
- The 'interference by process' framework can be extended to meaning-based verbal tasks.
- Semantic relatedness and task demands are crucial in determining irrelevant speech effects.
- Both interference by content and attentional capture models are considered alongside the proposed framework.
More Related Videos
08:32Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
Published on: September 5, 2019
07:36Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Interference: Path Lengths
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Language and Cognition
Auditory Pathway
When viewed cross-sectionally, the cochlea reveals the scala vestibuli and scala tympani flanking the...
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
Gestalt Principles of Perception