Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026
An Efficient and Reproducible Protocol for Distraction Osteogenesis in a Rat Model Leading to a Functional Regenerated Femur
Published on: October 23, 2017
The stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy and factors related to skeletal relapse
Chun-Ming Chen1, Steven Sheng-Tsung Lai, Chau-Hsiang Wang
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan.
Background:
Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) have been advocated as two major procedures for the correction of mandibular prognathism. However, only a few reports with at least a 2-year follow-up period describe the long-term stability especially of the IVRO method. This study aimed to identify factors contributing to skeletal relapse after a 2-year postoperative follow-up period.
Methods:
A set of three standardized lateral cephalograms were obtained from each subject, taken preoperatively (T1), immediately postoperatively (T2), and 2 years postoperatively (T3). Relapse was defined as forward movement of the menton (Me) after a 2-year follow-up period. Two angular measurements (SNB and SN-occlusal plane angle) and five linear measurements (horizontal Me, vertical Me, overbite, anterior facial height, and mandibular length) were compared immediately after the operation and at the 2-year follow-up visit.
Results:
The mean setback of the menton was 12.8 mm, and the mean relapse was 1.3 mm (10.2% = 1.3/12.8). The magnitude of the setback was not significantly accounted for in the relapse. There were weak correlations between the relapse and the concerned factors, namely, overbite, anterior facial height, mandibular length SNB, and SN-occlusal plane angle).
Conclusion:
The current study confirmed the stability of IVRO in the treatment of mandibular prognathism.