Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Soil Sampling and Isolation of Entomopathogenic Nematodes (Steinernematidae, Heterorhabditidae)
07:45

Soil Sampling and Isolation of Entomopathogenic Nematodes (Steinernematidae, Heterorhabditidae)

Published on: July 11, 2014

[Field sampling methods for earthworm: a review].

Ru-Qin Fan1, Xiao-Ping Zhang, Ai-Zhen Liang

  • 1Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130012, China. ruqinfan2007@126.com

Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao = the Journal of Applied Ecology
|September 30, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study reviews earthworm sampling methods in China. Chemical repellents with hand-sorting are effective when soil disturbance is acceptable, while allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) suits sites where soil destruction is not feasible.

Related Concept Videos

Sampling Methods: Sample Types01:18

Sampling Methods: Sample Types

Sampling materials are classified into three main types: solid, liquid, and gas.
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association of multidisciplinary collaborative nursing with cognitive function and quality of life after craniotomy for glioma resection: a retrospective comparative study.

Frontiers in medicine·2026
Same author

Embodied Spatial Affordance: Spatial-Aware Affordance Learning for Embodied Navigation and Manipulation.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2026
Same author

Circadian clock and cancer.

Military Medical Research·2026
Same author

Multi-Omics Analysis Reveals m7G Methylation-Related Genes May Be Involved in TGF-β Signaling-Mediated Anti-PD-L1 Response in Bladder Cancer.

ImmunoTargets and therapy·2026
Same author

M2Restore: Mixture-of-Experts-Based Mamba-CNN Fusion Framework for All-in-One Image Restoration.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2025
Same author

[Research on prediction of fracture reduction fixator therapy based on multimodal multi-label method].

Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology·2025

Area of Science:

  • Soil Ecology
  • Zoology
  • Environmental Science

Background:

  • Earthworms are vital soil ecosystem components, enhancing soil structure and nutrient cycling.
  • Earthworm activity significantly impacts soil quality and agricultural productivity.
  • A systematic review of earthworm field sampling methods, particularly in China, is lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare common field sampling methods for earthworms.
  • To discuss the advantages, effectiveness, and potential biases of each method.
  • To provide guidance on selecting appropriate methods for accurate earthworm community assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Review of operational processes for commonly used earthworm field sampling techniques.
  • Analysis of the merits and efficacy of chemical repellent, hand-sorting, and allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) methods.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Soil Sampling and Isolation of Entomopathogenic Nematodes (Steinernematidae, Heterorhabditidae)
07:45

Soil Sampling and Isolation of Entomopathogenic Nematodes (Steinernematidae, Heterorhabditidae)

Published on: July 11, 2014

  • Evaluation of the impact of sampling methods on research outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • Chemical repellent combined with hand-sorting is effective for characterizing earthworm communities where physical disturbance is permissible.
    • The allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) method is a suitable alternative for sites where soil destruction is not feasible.
    • Method selection significantly influences the accuracy of earthworm community size and structure data.

    Conclusions:

    • Appropriate selection of earthworm sampling methods is crucial for reliable ecological studies.
    • Both chemical repellent/hand-sorting and AITC methods offer viable options depending on site constraints.
    • Further research should focus on standardizing methods for comprehensive earthworm population assessment.