Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Complete Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Type IIIb
04:50

Complete Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Type IIIb

Published on: January 17, 2025

Laparoscopic radical cystectomy. Where do we stand?

Paolo Puppo1, Angelo Naselli

  • 1Urology Department, National Institute for Cancer Research, Genoa, Italy.

Archivos Espanoles De Urologia
|September 30, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ejaculation-sparing endoscopic surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

World journal of urology·2026
Same author

The eternal struggle between titans: Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) versus metformin in type 2 diabetes (T2D) gut dysmotility.

Journal of advanced research·2025
Same author

Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in men aged 80 years and older. Outcomes from a global, large, and multicenter series using different energy sources and techniques.

World journal of urology·2025
Same author

Editorial Comment.

The Journal of urology·2025
Same author

Correction: The infection post flexible UreteroreNoscopy (I-FUN) predictive model based on machine learning: a new clinical tool to assess the risk of sepsis post retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stone disease.

World journal of urology·2024
Same author

Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Refractory Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC): Current Guidance and Experience from Clinical Practice.

Research and reports in urology·2024
Same journal

Bladder Foreign Body of Gastrointestinal Origin: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Archivos espanoles de urologia·2026
Same journal

Real-Time Shear Wave Elastography Combined With MRI-Ultrasound Cognitive Fusion Targeted Biopsy for Repeat Prostate Biopsy.

Archivos espanoles de urologia·2026
Same journal

Evaluating a DeepSeek-Based Case-Based Learning Approach for Teaching the Emergency Management of Urosepsis to Nursing Students.

Archivos espanoles de urologia·2026
Same journal

Association of Fibrosis-Related Gene Expression Profiles in Benign Ureteral Stricture Tissue With Restenosis After Ureteroplasty.

Archivos espanoles de urologia·2026
Same journal

Retrospective Comparison of Transurethral Prostatic Columnar Water Balloon Dilation and Pharmacotherapy for Moderate-to-Severe Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Efficacy, Safety and Compliance.

Archivos espanoles de urologia·2026
Same journal

Analysis of the Effect of Stepwise Refined Nursing on the Severity of Ureteral Stent-Related Symptom Clusters After Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.

Archivos espanoles de urologia·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) shows feasibility but lacks long-term cancer control data. Its claimed benefits over open radical cystectomy (ORC) may stem from patient selection, not reduced invasiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • Laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to open radical cystectomy (ORC) in 1999.
  • Proponents suggest LRC offers faster recovery and shorter hospital stays than ORC, with comparable oncological outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility, oncological control, and patient outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (LRC).
  • To compare the benefits of LRC against Open Radical Cystectomy (ORC).

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of published peer-reviewed papers on Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (LRC).
  • Analysis of approximately 900 reported cases, with the largest series including 85 patients.
  • Assessment of urinary diversion techniques (ileal conduit, ileal neobladder) and follow-up durations.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Complete Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Type IIIb
04:50

Complete Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Type IIIb

Published on: January 17, 2025

Main Results:

  • Feasibility of LRC is demonstrated, with overall survival rates ranging from 72% to 95%.
  • Limited follow-up (median 31 months, longest 58 months) and lower-than-expected disease-free survival rates raise concerns about cancer control.
  • Advocated LRC advantages appear linked to patient selection, as outcomes are comparable to ORC when patient and disease characteristics are similar.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) is currently considered an experimental procedure.
  • Long-term oncological outcomes and definitive benefits of LRC over Open Radical Cystectomy (ORC) require further investigation with extended follow-up.