Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Confocal Time Lapse Imaging as an Efficient Method for the Cytocompatibility Evaluation of Dental Composites
Published on: November 9, 2014
Clinical evaluation of postoperative sensitivity using self-etching adhesives containing glutaraldehyde
Armando Brito Chermont1, Karina Kato Carneiro, Marcelo Figueiredo Lobato
1Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil. mario-honorato@hotmail.com
This clinical study found no significant difference in postoperative sensitivity (POS) after 48 hours and seven days when using three different dental adhesive systems for occlusal restorations.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Dental Materials Science
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Postoperative sensitivity (POS) is a common concern following dental restorations.
- Dental adhesive systems play a crucial role in bonding restorative materials and may influence POS.
- Glutaraldehyde-containing agents are utilized in some adhesive systems for their potential desensitizing properties.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of postoperative sensitivity (POS) at 48 hours and seven days.
- To evaluate POS in occlusal restorations bonded with three distinct adhesive systems: Adper SBMP-Plus (SBMP), Gluma Comfort One Bond + Desensitizer (GC+D), and I Bond (IB).
- To assess the influence of glutaraldehyde-containing adhesives on POS.
Main Methods:
- A clinical study involving occlusal restorations using three adhesive systems: SBMP (three-step etch-and-rinse), GC+D (two-step etch-and-rinse), and IB (all-in-one self-etching/priming).
- All restorations were placed using Filtek Supreme nanoparticle composite resin.
- Postoperative sensitivity was evaluated at 48 hours and seven days post-procedure. Data were analyzed using the non-parametric Friedman test.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences in postoperative sensitivity (POS) were observed among the three tested adhesive groups.
- POS levels were comparable between the SBMP, GC+D, and IB adhesive systems at both the 48-hour and seven-day evaluation points.
- The presence of glutaraldehyde in GC+D and IB did not lead to a significant reduction in POS compared to SBMP.
Conclusions:
- The choice among the evaluated adhesive systems (SBMP, GC+D, IB) did not significantly impact postoperative sensitivity in occlusal restorations.
- Glutaraldehyde-containing adhesives (GC+D, IB) did not demonstrate a significant advantage in reducing postoperative sensitivity compared to the non-glutaraldehyde containing system (SBMP).
- Further research may explore long-term sensitivity and other clinical parameters associated with these adhesive systems.
More Related Videos
03:07Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses
Published on: October 11, 2024
03:10Pilot In Vitro Study to Assess Cleaning Ability and Effects of Different Decontamination Methods on Implant Surfaces
Published on: November 21, 2025