Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
Published on: September 7, 2019
Estimating measurement uncertainty in quantitative methods not based on chromatography for doping control purposes
P Van Eenoo1, P Van Renterghem, C H Dimopoulou
1DoCoLab, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Ghent University (UGent), Technologiepark 30, B-9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium. Peter.VanEenoo@Ugent.be
This study evaluates a top-down model for estimating measurement uncertainty (MU) in non-chromatographic methods. A practical methodology is proposed, adaptable for haematological parameters and human growth hormone misuse detection, ensuring reliable quantitative results.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Forensic Science
- Analytical Chemistry
Background:
- ISO/IEC 17025 mandates measurement uncertainty (MU) estimation for quantitative results.
- MU estimation is established for chromatography but less so for non-chromatographic methods.
- Practical methodologies for MU in non-chromatographic analyses are scarce.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the applicability of a chromatography-based top-down MU model to non-chromatographic methods.
- To propose a practical methodology for estimating MU in diverse analytical contexts.
- To address the need for robust MU estimation in areas like haematology and human growth hormone misuse detection.
Main Methods:
- Adaptation of a top-down model for MU estimation.
- Application to two distinct case studies: haematological parameters and human growth hormone misuse.
- Utilizing available data, including quality control, proficiency testing, and method validation results.
Main Results:
- Successful evaluation of the top-down model for non-chromatographic methods.
- A proposed methodology incorporating long-term bias, imprecision, and standard impurity correction.
- Demonstrated adaptability for both data-rich and data-limited scenarios.
Conclusions:
- The proposed methodology provides a dynamic and re-evaluatable approach to MU estimation.
- It offers a practical solution for laboratories performing non-chromatographic quantitative analyses.
- Verification using proficiency testing results is a key component for validating MU estimations.
More Related Videos
13:35A Convenient Method for Extraction and Analysis with High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography of Catecholamine Neurotransmitters and Their Metabolites
Published on: March 1, 2018
07:57Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
Published on: July 25, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty: Overview
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error