Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Analysis of Congenital Heart Defects in Mouse Embryos Using Qualitative and Quantitative Histological Methods
Published on: March 10, 2020
Updated National Birth Prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006
Samantha E Parker1, Cara T Mai, Mark A Canfield
1National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.
Insights
Updated national birth defect prevalence estimates show significant variation based on surveillance methods and pregnancy outcomes. These findings are crucial for public health monitoring and prevention strategies in the U.S.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Pediatrics
Background:
- The National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) collects state-specific data for national birth defect prevalence estimates.
- Previous national estimates for 21 birth defects were published using 1999-2001 data.
- This study updates these national prevalence estimates using more recent data from 2004-2006.
Purpose of the Study:
- To update national birth defect prevalence estimates using 2004-2006 data.
- To analyze the impact of different surveillance methods on prevalence estimates.
- To assess the influence of pregnancy outcomes on prevalence estimates for specific defects.
Main Methods:
- Utilized population-based data from active and passive surveillance programs.
- Calculated pooled birth prevalence estimates for 21 birth defects, stratified by ascertainment approach.
- Determined national prevalence estimates adjusted for maternal race/ethnicity and age, and assessed the impact of elective terminations.
Main Results:
- National prevalence estimates ranged from 0.72 (common truncus) to 14.47 (Down syndrome) per 10,000 live births.
- Active surveillance programs reported higher prevalence for anencephaly, anophthalmia/microphthalmia, cleft lip, upper limb reduction defects, and trisomy 18.
- Prevalence of anencephaly, trisomy 13, and trisomy 18 varied significantly when elective terminations were included.
Conclusions:
- Accurate and timely national birth defect prevalence estimates are essential for trend monitoring.
- These estimates support the assessment of prevention efforts and public health service planning.
- Understanding the burden of disease due to birth defects is critical for the U.S.
Background:
The National Birth Defects Prevention Network collects state-specific birth defects surveillance data for annual publication of prevalence estimates and collaborative research projects. In 2006, data for 21 birth defects from 1999 through 2001 were presented as national birth prevalence estimates. The purpose of this report was to update these estimates using data from 2004 through 2006.
Methods:
Population-based data from 11 active case-finding programs, 6 passive case-finding programs with case confirmation, and 7 passive programs without case confirmation were used in this analysis. Pooled birth prevalence estimates for 21 birth defects, stratified by case ascertainment approach, were calculated. National prevalence estimates, adjusted for maternal race/ethnicity and maternal age (trisomy 13, trisomy 18, and Down syndrome only) were determined using data from 14 programs. The impact of pregnancy outcomes on prevalence estimates was also assessed for five specific defects.
Results:
National birth defects prevalence estimates ranged from 0.72 per 10,000 live births for common truncus to 14.47 per 10,000 live births for Down syndrome. Stratification by type of surveillance system showed that active programs had a higher prevalence of anencephaly, anophthalmia/microphthalmia, cleft lip with or without cleft palate, reduction defect of upper limbs, and trisomy 18. The birth prevalence of anencephaly, trisomy 13, and trisomy 18 also varied substantially with inclusion of elective terminations.
Conclusion:
Accurate and timely national estimates of the prevalence of birth defects are needed for monitoring trends, assessing prevention efforts, determining service planning, and understanding the burden of disease due to birth defects in the United States.
Related Concept Videos
Teratogenicity
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health condition at a...
Neurulation
Probability Laws
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...

