Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square distribution,...

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Reporting Interest-Holder Engagement in Practice Guidelines: The RIGHT-MuSE Checklist.

Annals of internal medicine·2026

Same author

Editors' Choice: July 2026.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same author

Skin cancer mortality in Australian and New Zealand kidney transplant recipients: A population-based cohort study using linked health data, 1990-2019.

The British journal of dermatology·2026

Same author

Editors' Choice: June 2026.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same author

Steroid avoidance or withdrawal for kidney transplant recipients.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026

Same author

Editors' Choice: May 2026.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same journal

Paroxysmal Cold Haemoglobinuria: A Chilling Case of Acute Renal Failure.

Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.)·2026

Same journal

Optimising Therapeutic Target Attainment in Vancomycin Therapy for Patients Requiring Intermittent Haemodialysis.

Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.)·2026

Same journal

Injury to E- and VE-Cadherin in Paediatric Idiopathic Steroid-Sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome: Potential Markers of the Disease Status.

Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.)·2026

Same journal

Finerenone in Treating a 12-Year-Old Boy Suffering Gitelman Syndrome Without Causing Gynecomastia.

Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.)·2026

Same journal

NCOA4-Mediated Ferroptosis Drives Tubulointerstitial Fibrosis in Hyperuricemia-Associated Chronic Kidney Disease.

Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.)·2026

Same journal

Comment on 'Chronic Kidney Disease-Associated Pruritus in Patients on Home Haemodialysis'.

Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.)·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

How to write a Cochrane systematic review.

Lorna K Henderson¹, Jonathan C Craig, Narelle S Willis

¹Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Millennium Institute, University of Sydney at Westmead Hospital Sydney School of Public Health, New South Wales, Australia.

Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.)

|October 2, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The Cochrane Collaboration produces systematic reviews to enhance healthcare decisions. This guide outlines the process for creating new or updating existing Cochrane Reviews, ensuring evidence-based practice.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

Area of Science:

Health Sciences
Evidence-Based Medicine
Systematic Reviews

Background:

The Cochrane Collaboration is a global network dedicated to improving healthcare decision-making.
Systematic reviews are crucial for synthesizing health research findings.
The Cochrane Library hosts these reviews, regularly updated with new evidence.

Purpose of the Study:

To detail the methodology for initiating a new Cochrane Review.
To provide guidance on updating existing Cochrane Reviews.
To support volunteer authors in conducting systematic reviews.

Main Methods:

Describes the systematic process for undertaking Cochrane Reviews.
Highlights resources available for volunteer authors, including training and software.
Emphasizes the importance of regular updates as new evidence emerges.

Main Results:

Provides a clear framework for conducting systematic reviews.
Empowers volunteer authors with necessary tools and knowledge.
Ensures the accessibility and currency of health evidence.

Conclusions:

The described steps facilitate the production and maintenance of high-quality Cochrane Reviews.
This process supports evidence-based healthcare globally.
Adherence to the methodology ensures the reliability of systematic reviews.