[Facial graft, archetype of microsurgical innovation?]

Is innovation breaking of the way of thinking, breaker of taboos, concretisation of chimeras or simple benefit of an ineluctable evolution? The surgical act should be considered as innovation itself? From the first facial allotransplantation, innovation is declined in various ways, which could constitute the different answers regarding the planning and management to prepare such surgery, the realisation of the transplantation and also the multiple developments in terms of science and medicine. It is exactly in that meaning that could be really mentioned the term archetypal.