Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Quality of Water

Quality of Water

In concrete preparation, the quality of water is paramount as it affects the strength and durability of the concrete. Potable water is usually preferred; however, it must not have excessive sodium or potassium to prevent compromising the concrete's integrity. Water quality is typically evaluated based on impurities such as dissolved solids, chlorides, and sulfates, and its pH value is ideally between 6 and 8. Even slightly acidic natural water may be acceptable unless it contains harmful...

Testing Water Quality

Testing Water Quality

When the quality of water for concrete preparation is uncertain, its impact on the setting time of cement and compressive strength of mortar is assessed by comparison with de-ionized or distilled water benchmarks. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) C1602 requires the setting times to be within 90 minutes of the control, British Standard (BS) 3146:1980 allows a 30-minute variance in the initial setting, while British Standards European Norm (BS EN) 1008 specifies initial setting...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Developing a Status and Trends Assessment for Floating Kelp Canopies across Large Geographic Areas.

Environmental science & technology·2025

Same author

Correction: Health risks to children from exposure to fecally-contaminated recreational water.

PloS one·2024

Same author

Informing methods for detecting and quantifying microplastics through the lens of a global intercalibration exercise: An editorial overview of the special issue and beyond.

Chemosphere·2024

Same author

Development of an accreditation process for analytical methods to measure microplastics in drinking water for regulatory monitoring.

Chemosphere·2024

Same author

The influence of complex matrices on method performance in extracting and monitoring for microplastics.

Chemosphere·2023

Same author

Relationship between coliphage and Enterococcus at southern California beaches and implications for beach water quality management.

Water research·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Framework for interpreting sediment quality triad data.

Steven M Bay¹, Stephen B Weisberg

¹Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, 3535 Harbor Blvd., Suite 110, Costa Mesa, CA 92626, USA. steveb@sccwrp.org

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

|October 2, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A new quantitative framework objectively integrates sediment quality triad data, improving upon subjective best professional judgment (BPJ). This method enhances large-scale environmental assessments by providing reproducible and transparent classifications.

More Related Videos

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds

Published on: September 26, 2017

A Flow-through Exposure System for Evaluating Suspended Sediments Effects on Aquatic Life

A Flow-through Exposure System for Evaluating Suspended Sediments Effects on Aquatic Life

Published on: January 9, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds

Published on: September 26, 2017

A Flow-through Exposure System for Evaluating Suspended Sediments Effects on Aquatic Life

A Flow-through Exposure System for Evaluating Suspended Sediments Effects on Aquatic Life

Published on: January 9, 2017

Area of Science:

Environmental Science
Ecotoxicology
Risk Assessment

Background:

Sediment quality triad assessments often rely on expert best professional judgment (BPJ).
BPJ can be subjective, posing challenges for large datasets and regulatory transparency.
Reproducibility and objectivity are crucial for consistent environmental assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and validate a quantitative, objective framework for integrating multiple lines of evidence (MLOE) in sediment quality triad assessments.
To compare the framework's performance against expert judgment in classifying sediment sites.
To provide a transparent and reproducible method for large-scale sediment quality evaluations.

Main Methods:

A novel framework was developed based on two key questions: biological degradation and potential for chemical exposure to cause biological response.
The framework was applied to 25 California sediment sites.
Classifications from the framework were compared with those of six independent experts.

Main Results:

The quantitative framework achieved classifications matching the median expert judgment better than five out of six experts.
The framework demonstrated unbiased performance, with differing classifications evenly split between more and less impacted.
The framework successfully distinguished between known degraded and reference sediment areas.

Conclusions:

The presented framework offers an objective and reproducible alternative to expert judgment for sediment quality triad assessments.
This approach is particularly valuable for large-scale assessments where expert input is impractical.
The framework provides a transparent method for integrating MLOE data in environmental risk assessments.