Carotid intima media thickness in rheumatoid arthritis as compared to control subjects: a meta-analysis
Alper M van Sijl1, Mike J Peters, Dirk K Knol
1Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Insights
Rheumatoid arthritis patients show increased carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), indicating higher cardiovascular risk. This meta-analysis confirms elevated cIMT in RA, supporting its use in risk assessment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Rheumatology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is linked to a higher risk of cardiovascular disease.
- Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) is a key indicator for cardiovascular risk assessment.
- Evaluating cIMT differences in RA populations is crucial for understanding cardiovascular burden.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate the difference in cIMT between rheumatoid arthritis patients and control groups.
- To assess the utility of cIMT as a cardiovascular risk marker in RA.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search and random effects meta-analysis were conducted.
- 22 studies comparing cIMT in RA patients and controls were included.
- Meta-regression analyzed the influence of age and cardiovascular risk factors on cIMT differences.
Main Results:
- RA patients exhibited significantly greater cIMT compared to controls in 17 out of 22 studies.
- The overall mean cIMT difference was 0.09 mm (95% CI: 0.07-0.11 mm).
- Differences in baseline cardiovascular risk factors, not age, likely contributed to heterogeneity.
Conclusions:
- The findings support the increased cardiovascular risk associated with rheumatoid arthritis.
- Carotid intima-media thickness is a valuable measure in observational studies of RA patients.
- Further prospective studies are needed to establish cIMT's role as a surrogate cardiovascular risk marker in RA.
Objectives:
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) is frequently used to identify populations at elevated cardiovascular risk. A systematic literature search and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate cIMT difference between RA and controls.
Methods:
The literature was screened to identify all available studies comparing cIMT in RA patients and controls. Random effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the overall mean cIMT difference between both groups. Meta-regression was performed to assess the influence of age and the degree of comparability regarding established cardiovascular risk factors on cIMT difference. Potential publication bias was examined by a funnel plot and Egger test.
Results:
From 22 studies, cIMT data were available from 1384 RA patients and 1147 controls. In 17 of the studies, RA patients had a statistically significantly greater cIMT. The overall mean cIMT difference was 0.09 mm (95%CI: 0.07-0.11 mm). Heterogeneity was observed (I(2) 72.5%, P < 0.001). A likely source of heterogeneity was the difference in cardiovascular risk factors between RA patients and controls at baseline, but not age. The funnel plot did not show a skewed or asymmetrical shape, which was supported by the Egger's test (P = 0.87).
Conclusions:
Our observations support the current evidence base for an increased cardiovascular burden in RA and support the use of cIMT in observational studies in RA patients. The next step is to determine its utility as a surrogate cardiovascular risk marker in RA in prospective studies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Atherosclerosis III: Management


