Evaluating patients for second-line antiretroviral therapy in India: the role of targeted viral load testing

The identification and management of first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) failure is a key challenge for HIV programs in resource-limited settings. In 2008, the National AIDS Control Organisation, India piloted a national strategy to provide second-line ART. We assessed the National AIDS Control Organisation second-line ART evaluation algorithm.

Adult patients who had received 6 months or more of standard first-line ART were referred for second-line ART evaluation if they demonstrated CD4 decline to pre-ART values, CD4 drop to less than 50% of peak on-treatment value, failure to achieve CD4 greater than 100 c/mm(3), or development of a new World Health Organization Stage 3 or 4 AIDS-defining illness. Patients received HIV RNA testing, and those with HIV RNA 10,000 c/mL or greater qualified to switch to second-line ART. World Health Organization-defined clinical and CD4 criteria for ART failure were compared against virologic failure criteria.

Between January and June 2008, 154 patients met criteria for evaluation. Of 122 (79%) patients who had HIV RNA testing, 87 (71%) had viral load 10,000 c/mL or greater and were recommended to start second-line ART, 29 (24%) had viral load less than 400 c/mL, and six (5%) had viral load between 400 and 10,000 c/mL. The positive predictive value of World Health Organization clinical/immunologic criteria to detect virologic failure was 71% (95% confidence interval, 63% to 79%).

Second-line ART was initiated in the public sector in India using an approach combining clinical and immunologic evaluation with confirmation of virologic failure. Almost 25% of patients who met clinical/immunologic failure criteria demonstrated virologic suppression. Inclusion of targeted HIV RNA testing in the evaluation of treatment failure can prevent unnecessary switches to second-line ART.