Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

An In Ovo Model for Testing Insulin-mimetic Compounds
Published on: April 23, 2018
Initial short-term intensive insulin therapy as a strategy for evaluating the preservation of beta-cell function with
R Retnakaran1, Y Qi, C Opsteen
1Leadership Sinai Centre for Diabetes, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. rretnakaran@mtsinai.on.ca
Aim:
Studies evaluating the effects of oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) on beta-cell function in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are confounded by an inability to establish the actual baseline degree of beta-cell dysfunction, independent of the deleterious effects of hyperglycaemia (glucotoxicity). Because intensive insulin therapy (IIT) can induce normoglycaemia, we reasoned that short-term IIT could enable evaluation of the beta-cell protective capacity of OADs, free from confounding hyperglycaemia. We applied this strategy to assess the effect of sitagliptin on beta-cell function.
Methods:
In this pilot study, 37 patients with T2DM of 6.0 + 6.4 years duration and A1c 7.0 + 0.8% on 0-2 OADs were switched to 4-8 weeks of IIT consisting of basal detemir and premeal insulin aspart. Subjects achieving fasting glucose <7.0 mmol/l 1 day after completing IIT (n = 21) were then randomized to metformin with either sitagliptin (n = 10) or placebo (n = 11). Subjects were followed for 48 weeks, with serial assessment of beta-cell function [ratio of AUC(Cpep) to AUC(gluc) over Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (AUC(Cpep/gluc) /HOMA-IR)] on 4-h meal tests.
Results:
During the study, fasting glucagon-like-peptide-1 was higher (p = 0.003) and A1c lower in the sitagliptin arm (p = 0.016). Nevertheless, although beta-cell function improved during the IIT phase, it declined similarly in both arms over time (p = 0.61). By study end, AUC(Cpep/gluc) /HOMA-IR was not significantly different between the placebo and sitagliptin arms (median 71.2 vs 80.4; p = 0.36).
Conclusions:
Pretreatment IIT can provide a useful strategy for evaluating the beta-cell protective capacity of diabetes interventions. In this pilot study, improved A1c with sitagliptin could not be attributed to a significant effect on preservation of beta-cell function.
Insights
Intensive insulin therapy (IIT) helped assess oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) like sitagliptin. However, sitagliptin did not significantly preserve beta-cell function in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) despite improving A1c.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Metabolic Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management is challenged by accurately assessing beta-cell function due to hyperglycemia's confounding effects (glucotoxicity).
- Intensive insulin therapy (IIT) can normalize glucose levels, potentially allowing for a clearer evaluation of drug effects on beta-cells.
- This strategy was employed to investigate the impact of sitagliptin on beta-cell function, independent of glucotoxicity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the beta-cell protective capacity of sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
- To utilize a novel approach employing short-term intensive insulin therapy (IIT) to mitigate glucotoxicity and assess oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) effects.
- To determine if sitagliptin preserves beta-cell function in T2DM patients after an IIT-induced euglycemic period.
Main Methods:
- A pilot study involving 37 T2DM patients (duration 6.0 ± 6.4 years, A1c 7.0 ± 0.8%) initially on 0-2 OADs.
- Patients underwent 4-8 weeks of IIT (basal detemir, premeal insulin aspart), followed by randomization to metformin with sitagliptin (n=10) or placebo (n=11) for 48 weeks.
- Beta-cell function was assessed using the ratio of the area under the curve of C-peptide to glucose (AUC(Cpep/gluc)) adjusted for HOMA-IR.
Main Results:
- Sitagliptin treatment led to higher fasting glucagon-like-peptide-1 levels and lower A1c compared to placebo.
- While beta-cell function initially improved during IIT, it declined similarly in both sitagliptin and placebo groups over the 48-week follow-up.
- No significant difference in beta-cell function (AUC(Cpep/gluc)/HOMA-IR) was observed between the sitagliptin and placebo arms by the study's end.
Conclusions:
- Short-term IIT is a viable strategy for assessing the beta-cell protective effects of diabetes interventions.
- Despite improving glycemic control (A1c), sitagliptin did not demonstrate a significant protective effect on beta-cell function in this pilot study.
- The confounding influence of glucotoxicity on beta-cell function assessment in T2DM can be mitigated using a pretreatment IIT approach.
Related Concept Videos
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Glucagon-like Receptor Agonists
GLP-1, when administered in high doses intravenously, triggers insulin secretion, inhibits glucagon release, slows gastric emptying, reduces food intake, and restores normal insulin secretion. However, its rapid inactivation by the...
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Sulfonylureas
