Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Early Detection of Cyanobacterial Blooms and Associated Cyanotoxins using Fast Detection Strategy
07:13

Early Detection of Cyanobacterial Blooms and Associated Cyanotoxins using Fast Detection Strategy

Published on: February 25, 2021

Assessing data availability for the development of REDD-plus national reference levels.

Chisa Umemiya1, Masahiro Amano, Suphawadee Wilamart

  • 1School of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Mikajima 2-579-15, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-1192, Japan. umemiya@toki.waseda.jp.

Carbon Balance and Management
|October 6, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Developing countries face data limitations for setting national reference levels (RLs) for REDD-plus. This study compares historical, forest-trend, and business-as-usual RLs to guide RL selection based on data availability.

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Wound, Pressure Ulcer, and Burn Guidelines (2023)-6: Guidelines for the Management of Burns, Third Edition.

The Journal of dermatology·2026
Same author

[A Case of Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Postoperative Duodenal Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer].

Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy·2026
Same author

An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase II Study of Bexarotene in Patients with Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma.

The Journal of dermatology·2025
Same author

Maximum Standard Uptake Value of Pre-Therapeutic <sup>18</sup>F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Predicts Outcomes in Indolent Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma Patients With Cutaneous Involvement.

The Journal of dermatology·2025
Same author

Rare Case of Additional Ileocecal Resection for Ascending Colon Cancer with R1 Resection due to Advanced Perineural Invasion.

Surgical case reports·2025
Same author

Wound, pressure ulcer, and burn guidelines - 3: Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic ulcers and gangrene, second edition.

The Journal of dermatology·2025

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Forestry
  • Climate Change Policy

Background:

  • Data availability in developing nations is highly variable, hindering the establishment of national reference levels (RLs) for REDD-plus.
  • Thailand serves as a case study to compare different RL methodologies under the UNFCCC framework.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare three types of reference levels (RLs): historical, projected forest-trend, and business-as-usual (BAU).
  • To assess the data requirements and characteristics of each RL type for REDD-plus implementation.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of three distinct RL methodologies.
  • Evaluation of data requirements for each RL type: historical, forest-trend, and BAU.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Early Detection of Cyanobacterial Blooms and Associated Cyanotoxins using Fast Detection Strategy
07:13

Early Detection of Cyanobacterial Blooms and Associated Cyanotoxins using Fast Detection Strategy

Published on: February 25, 2021

  • Different RLs produce varying estimates of future deforestation areas.
  • Historical RLs require simple data but are sensitive to the chosen reference period.
  • Forest-trend RLs offer improved reliability with smooth deforestation curves.
  • BAU RLs are complex but essential for demonstrating REDD-plus additionality and distinguishing national efforts.

Conclusions:

  • Countries should select RLs based on their data availability, progressing from simpler to more complex methods.
  • Support is crucial for enhancing data collection systems in countries with limited capacity participating in REDD-plus.