Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Murine Echocardiography of Left Atrium, Aorta, and Pulmonary Artery
Published on: February 20, 2017
Usefulness of left atrial volume versus diameter to assess thromboembolic risk in mitral stenosis
Niall G Keenan1, Caroline Cueff, Claire Cimadevilla
1Cardiology Department, AP-HP, Bichat Hospital, Paris, France.
Insights
Left atrial volume, not diameter, better predicts thromboembolic risk in mitral stenosis patients. Using indexed LA volume could significantly alter anticoagulation decisions, suggesting a threshold of 60 ml/m² for better management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Thrombosis
Background:
- Current guidelines recommend anticoagulation for mitral stenosis (MS) patients in sinus rhythm (SR) based on left atrial (LA) diameter.
- Left atrial enlargement is a known risk factor for thromboembolic events in MS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the association of LA diameter and LA volume with thromboembolic risk markers in MS patients.
- To evaluate the utility of LA volume indexed to body surface area (BSA) for guiding anticoagulation decisions.
Main Methods:
- Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed in 152 patients with moderate to severe MS.
- Thromboembolic risk was assessed using peak LA appendage emptying velocity (LAAv) and spontaneous contrast density.
- LA diameter and LA volume were measured and correlated with risk markers.
Main Results:
- BSA-indexed LA volume, unlike LA diameter, significantly differentiated patients with high thromboembolic risk (defined by LAAv < 25 cm/s and/or dense spontaneous contrast).
- BSA-indexed LA volume showed a higher area under the curve (0.85) for predicting high thromboembolic risk compared to LA diameter (0.65).
- A threshold of 60 ml/m² for BSA-indexed LA volume demonstrated 90% sensitivity for high risk, potentially altering anticoagulation indications in 51-77% of patients.
Conclusions:
- Left atrial volume is a more robust predictor of thromboembolic risk than LA diameter in MS patients.
- Utilizing BSA-indexed LA volume, with a suggested threshold of 60 ml/m², may improve the management and anticoagulation decisions in these patients.
- This approach could lead to significant changes in clinical practice for MS management.
Abstract:
In patients with mitral stenosis (MS) in sinus rhythm (SR), guidelines recommend anticoagulation if the left atrium is enlarged based on diameter measurements. We sought to compare the association of left atrial (LA) diameter and LA volume with markers of thromboembolic risk (peak LA appendage emptying velocity [LAAv] and LA spontaneous contrast density) measured during transesophageal echocardiography in 152 patients with moderate to severe MS. High thromboembolic risk was defined by a peak LAAv < 25 cm/s and/or dense spontaneous contrast. Mean LA diameter (50 ± 7 mm, 32 to 77) and LA volume (152 ± 70 ml, 67 to 720) were significantly correlated (r = 0.71, p < 0.0001), but the relation was curvilinear and the 95% confidence interval increased with LA diameter. In the subset of 80 patients in SR who underwent clinically indicated transesophageal echocardiography, body surface area (BSA)-indexed LA volume but not LA diameter differentiated patients with normal from those with low LAAv (86 ± 17 vs 71 ± 17 ml/m(2), p < 0.01, and 50 ± 6 vs 48 ± 6 mm, p = 0.13, respectively) and patients with dense spontaneous contrast from those with no or mild spontaneous contrast (81 ± 16 vs 63 ± 15 ml/m(2), p < 0.01, and 49 ± 6 vs 46 ± 5 mm, p = 0.11, respectively). BSA-indexed LA volume provided the highest area under the curve (0.85) for high thromboembolic risk and LA diameter the lowest (0.65). A BSA-indexed LA volume > 60 ml/m(2) provided an excellent 90% sensitivity despite 44% specificity, 76% positive predictive value, and 70% negative predictive value. Use of this threshold instead of 50 or 55 mm would have changed the indication for anticoagulation in 51% to 77% of patients. In conclusion, LA volume was more strongly associated with markers of thromboembolic risk than LA diameter, which poorly reflected LA size. Our results support the use of BSA-indexed LA volume to guide the decision for anticoagulation in patients with MS in SR, which may lead to significant change in the management of those patients. We suggest a threshold of 60 ml/m(2), which has good sensitivity, albeit with low specificity.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
