Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Higher self-assessed subjective social status is associated with worse perception of others' emotions.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Curiosity evolves as information unfolds.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

Beyond money: Risk preferences across both economic and non-economic contexts predict financial decisions.

PloS one·2022
Same author

Author Correction: Peer presence increases the prosocial behavior of adolescents by speeding the evaluation of outcomes for others.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

Transient Motion Classification Through Turbid Volumes <i>via</i> Parallelized Single-Photon Detection and Deep Contrastive Embedding.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2022
Same author

Gaze-dependent evidence accumulation predicts multi-alternative risky choice behaviour.

PLoS computational biology·2022
Same journal

CEST MRI reveals nicotine-induced alterations in glutamate-associated molecular connectivity in the mouse brain.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Brain protein burden is related to intravoxel incoherent motion: PET-MR imaging study.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Screening the optimal rTSMS frequency to orchestrate immune-fibrotic remodeling for adult spinal cord repair.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Assessment of tenecteplase target-associated pathogenic mechanisms underlying depression in acute ischemic stroke patients: insights from artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics analysis and <i>in vitro</i> validation.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Sex-divergent intrinsic brain function in Parkinson's disease: elevated nigral fluctuations and premotor-visuospatial coupling in female patients.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Spatial transcriptomics on an expanded dataset at the brain-electrode interface: exploration of variability and identification of novel biomarkers.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Ten challenges for decision neuroscience.

Scott A Huettel1

  • 1Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University Durham, NC, USA.

Frontiers in Neuroscience
|October 6, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Decision neuroscience uses brain imaging to study economic choices but has limitations. Future research needs new ideas to fully understand decision-making mechanisms.

Keywords:
decision makingneuroeconomicsrewarduncertaintyvalue

More Related Videos

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Decision neuroscience
  • Neuroeconomics
  • Cognitive neuroscience

Background:

  • Current decision neuroscience research integrates neuroscience methods with social science concepts.
  • The prevalent neuroeconomic approach identifies neural correlates of economic variables, particularly subjective value.
  • Existing methods face limitations in fully explaining decision-making variability and computations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline 10 significant challenges for future decision neuroscience research.
  • To highlight the need for new conceptual frameworks beyond current methodologies.
  • To propose an integration of economics, cognitive science, and neurobiology.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of limitations in current decision neuroscience research.
  • Identification of key areas requiring further investigation.
  • Conceptualization of future research directions and interdisciplinary approaches.

Main Results:

  • Fundamental limitations in understanding decision-making mechanisms persist.
  • Sources of variability and computations in decision-making remain incompletely understood.
  • Current neuroeconomic approaches are insufficient to address all critical questions.

Conclusions:

  • Future decision neuroscience requires novel conceptual frameworks and methodologies.
  • An interdisciplinary approach merging economics, cognitive science, and neurobiology is essential.
  • Addressing outstanding challenges will advance our understanding of the neural basis of decision making.