Universal MRSA nasal surveillance: characterization of outcomes at a tertiary care center and implications for infection control
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Subcutaneous Infection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)
Published on: February 9, 2011
Najma Parvez1, Chetan Jinadatha, Robert Fader
1Division of Infectious Disease, Scott and White Memorial Hospital and Clinic, Temple, TX 76502, USA.
Background:
Recognition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal carriage by active surveillance cultures has been widely debated. Our institution implemented universal nasal screening by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for MRSA and isolation of screen positive patients in December 2007. Here we present data about the correlation between screen positivity and subsequent development of infection and the impact of isolation on surgical site infection rates.
Methods:
This was a retrospective, observational study from January 1, 2008, through June 30, 2008, on all inpatient admissions with a nasal MRSA PCR screen. Genotype of 15 MRSA blood isolates was determined utilizing the Diversilab® (bioMérieux, Hazelwood, MO) system. A phenotypic rule was deduced and utilized for analyzing all MRSA clinical isolates.
Results:
5375 patients were screened at ≤48 hours following admission. 581 MRSA positive nasal carriers (10.80%) were identified. 496 (85.3%) were asymptomatic MRSA nasal carriers. There were a total of 158 MRSA clinical infections. 85 (14.6%) MRSA nasal carriers had clinical infection. Of the 4794 (89.1%) non-nasally colonized patients, 73 (1.5%) had MRSA clinical infection. MRSA surgical site infection rate remained unchanged during the intervention period. Phenotypic predictive rule inferred 59.8% community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) infections and 40% hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA) infections.
Conclusions:
Our study showed a positive correlation between having a nasal screen positivity and subsequent development of infection. Isolation of MRSA screen positive patients alone as an intervention did not reduce the surgical site infection rates. Since most of our isolates are CA-MRSA, our institution is implementing several new interventions to further reduce the incidence of HA-MRSA conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Staphylococcal Skin Infections