Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies02:09

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Applicants of color encounter discrimination based on cultural foreignness stereotypes in the labor market.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

The gender gap in the care economy is larger in highly developed countries: Sociocultural explanations for paradoxical findings.

The American psychologist·2025
Same author

Divergence in children's gender stereotypes and motivation across STEM fields.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Removing masculine defaults in the hiring process.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Feedback receptivity from people in power reduces gender, sexual orientation, and disability bias concerns.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2025
Same author

Policy as normative influence? On the relationship between parental leave policy and social norms in gender division of childcare across 48 countries.

The British journal of social psychology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Explaining Underrepresentation: A Theory of Precluded Interest.

Sapna Cheryan, Victoria C Plaut

    Sex Roles
    |October 9, 2010
    PubMed
    Summary

    Perceived similarity to peers best explains why women are underrepresented in science, math, and engineering (SME) fields and men in humanities. Addressing social perceptions can help diversify academic fields.

    Area of Science:

    • Social Sciences
    • Psychology
    • Sociology

    Background:

    • Gender disparities persist in Science, Math, and Engineering (SME) fields, with women being underrepresented.
    • Conversely, men are underrepresented in humanities fields like English.
    • Understanding the social processes driving these underrepresentations is crucial for promoting diversity.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the social predictors of underrepresentation in both male-dominated (computer science) and female-dominated (English) academic fields.
    • To identify the key mediating factors influencing students' interest in these fields.

    Main Methods:

    • Two survey studies were conducted at two U.S. West Coast universities.
    • Participants (N=62; N=614) were surveyed on social predictors such as perceived similarity, social identity threats, and expectations of success.

    More Related Videos

    The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
    08:24

    The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

    Published on: August 25, 2023

    Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials
    09:40

    Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

    Published on: November 15, 2014

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

    A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
    14:43

    A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

    Published on: January 12, 2018

    The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
    08:24

    The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

    Published on: August 25, 2023

    Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials
    09:40

    Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

    Published on: November 15, 2014

    Main Results:

    • Perceived similarity to individuals within a field emerged as the strongest mediator for both women's lower interest in computer science and men's lower interest in English.
    • Social identity threats and expectations of success were less influential compared to perceived similarity.

    Conclusions:

    • Perceived similarity is a critical factor in academic field choice and contributes significantly to gender-based underrepresentation.
    • Interventions aimed at altering students' social perceptions and increasing their sense of belonging in underrepresented fields may enhance diversity.