Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Crossover from radial to femoral access during a challenging percutaneous coronary intervention can make the
Lauren Cooper1, Subhash Banerjee, Emmanouil S Brilakis
1Veterans Affairs North Texas Healthcare System, Dallas, TX, USA.
Insights
Radial access has lower bleeding risk than femoral access for coronary procedures. However, radial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be challenging; switching to femoral access may be optimal for specific saphenous vein graft lesions.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Access Techniques
Background:
- Radial artery access is associated with reduced bleeding complications compared to femoral artery access during coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Despite comparable success rates in experienced centers, radial PCI can present technical difficulties, particularly regarding catheter support.
Observation:
- A case of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesion using radial access was unsuccessful despite multiple attempts with various guide catheters and extended fluoroscopy.
- Conversion to femoral artery access facilitated the successful completion of the PCI for the SVG lesion.
Findings:
- Radial access, while beneficial for reducing bleeding, may not always provide adequate support for complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures, such as those involving saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions.
- Technical challenges encountered during radial PCI can necessitate a change in access strategy.
Implications:
- For specific percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) cases, particularly those involving saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions, an early transition from radial to femoral access may represent the most effective strategy.
- Operator experience and patient-specific anatomy should guide the choice of vascular access for complex PCI to optimize procedural success and patient outcomes.
Abstract:
Compared to femoral access, radial access carries lower bleeding risk during diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although, in experienced centers, PCI success rates are reported to be similar using radial or femoral access, radial PCI may be technically challenging due to poor catheter support. We report a case of radial PCI in a saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesion that failed, in spite of using multiple guide catheters and prolonged fluoroscopy time. After obtaining femoral access, PCI of the SVG lesion was easily accomplished. For selected PCI cases, early switching from radial to femoral access may be the optimum strategy.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management

