Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

11:53
Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
Published on: December 9, 2012
Using local knowledge to model asymmetric preference formation in willingness to pay for environmental services
1Socio-Economics, Macaulay Institute, Craigiebuckler, AB158QH Aberdeen, UK. klaus.glenk@sac.ac.uk
Journal of Environmental Management
|October 12, 2010
Summary
Environmental valuation models show that people value gains and losses differently. Accounting for this asymmetric preference formation provides more accurate willingness to pay (WTP) estimates for conservation programs.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Economics
- Behavioral Economics
- Conservation Science
Background:
- Discrete choice models are widely used for environmental valuation.
- Traditional models often assume symmetrical preferences for gains and losses.
- Asymmetric preference formation, where individuals value gains and losses differently, is increasingly recognized in behavioral economics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and apply an approach to account for asymmetric preference formation in discrete choice models for environmental valuation.
- To assess the impact of asymmetric preferences on willingness to pay (WTP) estimates for environmental changes.
- To inform local strategies for biodiversity conservation by providing more accurate welfare measures.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from a case study on preferences for environmental change in Indonesia.
- Defined individual-specific status quo using local knowledge to frame environmental services as gains or losses.
- Estimated choice models with separate parameters for increases and decreases in attribute levels.
- Derived bidirectional willingness to pay (WTP) indicators relative to the individual-specific status quo.
Main Results:
- Found clear evidence of asymmetric responses to increases and decreases in environmental service attributes relative to the status quo.
- Demonstrated that ignoring asymmetric preference formation can lead to biased WTP estimates and welfare measures.
- Highlighted that accounting for both asymmetric preference formation and preference heterogeneity improves model insights.
Conclusions:
- Asymmetric preference formation is a significant factor in environmental valuation and must be considered for accurate economic assessments.
- Ignoring this asymmetry can lead to biased policy recommendations and suboptimal conservation strategies.
- Integrating asymmetric preferences and heterogeneity into choice models offers valuable insights for developing effective local conservation strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
Naturalistic Observations
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
Decision Making: P-value Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Ecological Niches
All organisms have a position within an ecosystem. The complete set of living and nonliving factors—including food resources, climate, and terrain—that define the position of a given organism are collectively referred to as the organism’s ecological niche.Multiple species cannot occupy the exact same niche within their habitat. If the niches of two or more species overlap to a large extent, the competitive exclusion principle dictates that one species will outcompete the other, forcing it to...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

