A comparison of fixation methods on lung morphology in a murine model of emphysema

Emphysema is characterized by enlargement of the alveoli, which is the most important parameter to assess the presence and severity of this disease. Alveolar enlargement is primarily defined on morphological criteria; therefore, characterization of this disease with morphological parameters is a prerequisite to study the pathogenesis. For this purpose, different methods of lung fixation were evaluated in a murine model of LPS-induced lung emphysema. Five different methods of lung fixation were evaluated: intratracheal instillation of fixatives, in situ fixation, fixed-volume fixation, vascular whole body perfusion, and vacuum inflation. In addition, the effects of three different fixatives (10% formalin, Carnoy's, and agarose/10% formalin solution) and two embedding methods (paraffin and plastic) were investigated on the murine lung morphology. Mice received intranasal administration of LPS to induce alveolar wall destruction. Quantification of air space enlargement was determined by mean linear intercept analysis, and the histological sections were analyzed for the most optimal fixation method. Additionally, routine immunohistological staining was performed on lung tissue of PBS-treated mice. Intratracheal instillation of formalin or agarose/formalin solution, in situ fixation, and fixed-volume fixation provided a normal lung architecture, in contrast to the lungs fixed via whole body perfusion and vacuum inflation. Formalin-fixed lungs resulted in the most optimal lung morphology for lung emphysema analysis when embedded in paraffin, while for Carnoy's fixed lungs, plastic embedding was preferred. The histological findings, the mean linear intercept measurement, and the immunohistochemistry data demonstrated that fixation by intratracheal instillation of 10% formalin or in situ fixation with 10% formalin are the two most optimal methods to fix lungs for alveolar enlargement analysis to study lung emphysema.