Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Biological Effects of Radiation02:59

Biological Effects of Radiation

All radioactive nuclides emit high-energy particles or electromagnetic waves. When this radiation encounters living cells, it can cause heating, break chemical bonds, or ionize molecules. The most serious biological damage results when these radioactive emissions fragment or ionize molecules. For example, α and β particles emitted from nuclear decay reactions possess much higher energies than ordinary chemical bond energies. When these particles strike and penetrate matter, they produce ions...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray01:20

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray

The most common cardiovascular diagnostic test is an X-ray. It produces images of the heart, blood vessels, and adjacent structures.
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
X-ray Imaging01:24

X-ray Imaging

German physicist Wilhelm Röntgen (1845–1923) was experimenting with electrical current when he discovered that a mysterious and invisible "ray" would pass through his flesh but leave an outline of his bones on a screen coated with a metal compound. In 1895, Röntgen made the first durable record of the internal parts of a living human: an "X-ray" image (as it came to be called) of his wife’s hand. Scientists worldwide quickly began their own experiments with X-rays, and by 1900, X-ray was widely...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From mudflats and saltpans to Open Sea: Plastic ingestion and PBDE/MeO-BDE accumulation in Waterbirds from southern Portugal.

Marine pollution bulletin·2025
Same author

Electronic band evolution between Lieb and kagome nanoribbons.

Nanotechnology·2025
Same author

Tight-binding model of Pt-based jacutingaites as combination of the honeycomb and kagome lattices.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2024
Same author

Physiology and fertility of two gull species in relation to plastic additives' exposure.

The Science of the total environment·2024
Same author

Plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) technology as adjuvant to Ab Externo trabeculectomy.

International ophthalmology·2024
Same author

Early detection of interstitial lung disease in rheumatic diseases: A joint statement from the Portuguese Pulmonology Society, the Portuguese Rheumatology Society, and the Portuguese Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Society.

Pulmonology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities
06:51

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

Image quantification for radiation dose calculations--limitations and uncertainties.

J M Pereira1, M G Stabin, F R A Lima

  • 1Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.

Health Physics
|October 13, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Accurate radiation dose calculations in nuclear medicine require precise activity quantification. This study evaluated planar and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging limitations, finding SPECT generally superior for smaller objects and complex scenarios.

More Related Videos

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities
06:51

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Nuclear Medicine Imaging
  • Radiation Dosimetry
  • Medical Physics

Background:

  • Accurate radiation dose calculations in nuclear medicine rely on quantifying radiotracer activity.
  • Both planar imaging and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) have limitations affecting quantification accuracy.
  • Variability in estimates depends on factors like object size, background activity, and radionuclide properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the limitations of quantitative planar and SPECT imaging for activity quantification.
  • To assess the impact of object size, radionuclide type, and background on quantification accuracy.
  • To determine the suitability of these methods for absorbed dose calculations in organs and tumors.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized phantoms of varying complexity (spheres, cardiac, torso) with three radionuclides (⁹⁹mTc, ¹³¹I, ¹¹¹In) at different concentrations and background levels.
  • Acquired planar and SPECT/CT images using a modern system.
  • Applied attenuation and scatter corrections for planar and SPECT reconstructions.

Main Results:

  • Good accuracy (±10%) achieved for large spherical sources (11.5 mL) with ⁹⁹mTc and ¹³¹I using both methods.
  • Quantification accuracy decreased for smaller objects, especially with ¹¹¹In, where SPECT showed larger errors due to partial volume effects.
  • SPECT provided more consistent results across varying activity concentrations, particularly in complex phantom setups and higher background levels.

Conclusions:

  • Planar and SPECT quantification can achieve >10% accuracy for large objects and moderate background levels with appropriate processing.
  • SPECT generally offers superior performance over planar imaging for smaller objects, higher backgrounds, and complex radionuclides.
  • Accurate background subtraction and scatter correction are crucial for reliable activity quantification in nuclear medicine.