Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Auditory Pathway01:15

Auditory Pathway

Auditory pathways constitute the complex neural circuits responsible for transmitting and interpreting auditory information from the peripheral auditory system to the brain. Sound waves are initially captured by the outer ear, funneled through the ear canal, and reach the tympanic membrane (eardrum). These vibrations are transmitted via the middle ear's ossicles to the inner ear's cochlea.
When viewed cross-sectionally, the cochlea reveals the scala vestibuli and scala tympani flanking the...
Hearing01:31

Hearing

When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
Sound Intensity Level00:53

Sound Intensity Level

Humans perceive sound by hearing. The human ear helps sound waves reach the brain, which then interprets the waves and creates the perception of hearing. The loudness of the environment in which a person is located determines whether they can distinguish between different sound sources.
The human ear can perceive an extensive range of sound intensity, necessitating the use of the logarithmic scale to define a physical quantity—the intensity level. It is a ratio of two intensities and hence a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Level-dependent IMD cancellation for single-transducer DPOAE measurement using a lookup-table method.

MethodsX·2026
Same author

Enhancing EEG-Based Brain Pattern Recognition Through Functional-Network-Level Volume Conduction Mitigation: Spatially Informed Decay Modeling-Residual Correction.

Brain sciences·2026
Same author

Spontaneous crack healing in calcite reveals the influence of dynamic strain evolution and surface chemistry.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Effects of plain water intake before bedtime on sleep and depressive mood among middle-aged Japanese men.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Development of Adhesive and Suction Vibrators for Enabling Easy Fixation in Distantly-Presented Bone-Conducted Ultrasound.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

Effects of noise exposure on intelligibility of bone-conducted speech during earplugging.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Functional Imaging of Auditory Cortex in Adult Cats using High-field fMRI
10:50

Functional Imaging of Auditory Cortex in Adult Cats using High-field fMRI

Published on: February 19, 2014

Temporal integration affects intensity change detection in human auditory cortex.

Yoshiharu Soeta1, Seiji Nakagawa

  • 1National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Midorigaoka, Ikeda, Osaka, Japan. y.soeta@aist.go.jp

Neuroreport
|October 13, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Temporal integration affects auditory evoked responses. The N1m response amplitude remained constant for intervals over 250 ms, suggesting neural population overlap and a disinhibitory process from sound offset.

More Related Videos

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning
08:43

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning

Published on: October 22, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Functional Imaging of Auditory Cortex in Adult Cats using High-field fMRI
10:50

Functional Imaging of Auditory Cortex in Adult Cats using High-field fMRI

Published on: February 19, 2014

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning
08:43

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning

Published on: October 22, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Sensory Processing
  • Neurophysiology

Background:

  • Auditory evoked responses reflect neural processing of sound.
  • Temporal integration is crucial for interpreting auditory stimuli.
  • Understanding N1m component dynamics is key to auditory perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate temporal integration effects on auditory evoked responses.
  • To clarify the relationship between sound intensity intervals and N1m amplitude.
  • To explore the neural mechanisms underlying auditory temporal processing.

Main Methods:

  • Measurement of auditory evoked fields (AEFs).
  • Utilized tones with varying intensity change intervals.
  • Analysis of the N1m component's amplitude and recovery function.

Main Results:

  • N1m amplitude remained constant for intensity change intervals > 250 ms.
  • N1m amplitude decreased for intervals < 250 ms.
  • Observed recovery function suggests proximity to anterior N1m neural populations.

Conclusions:

  • Auditory temporal integration influences N1m amplitude.
  • A disinhibitory process, potentially due to sound offset, occurs at shorter intervals.
  • Neural populations for N1m' and anterior N1m may be closely located.