Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches01:28

Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches

Designing a dosage regimen, which refers to the manner of drug administration, is a complex process involving the selection of drug dose, route, and frequency. This process is underpinned by pharmacokinetic parameters derived from tests and population averages. These parameters are then tailored to patient-specific variables such as diagnosis, demographics, and allergy status. Once therapy commences, therapeutic response monitoring is critical and achieved through clinical and physical...
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of Tourniquet Use During Surgical Treatment of Open Fractures.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2021
Same author

Advancing spinal fellowship training: an international multi-centre educational perspective.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2019
Same author

Injury in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu Training.

Sports health·2019
Same author

Posterior Thoracolumbar Instrumented Fusion for Burst Fractures: A Meta-analysis.

Clinical spine surgery·2019
Same author

Wound Surface Area as a Risk Factor for Flap Complications among Patients with Open Fractures.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2018
Same author

Outside the Bone: What Is Happening Systemically to Influence Fracture Healing?

Journal of orthopaedic trauma·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

Design issues in a non-regulatory trial.

Brad A Petrisor1, Christina Goldstein

  • 1Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedics, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Ontario, Canada. drcgoldstein@gmail.com

Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
|October 14, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are crucial for comparing orthopedic implants, but surgical complexities can introduce bias. This review addresses challenges in designing and appraising RCTs for orthopedic implants to improve evidence quality.

More Related Videos

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow
08:58

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow

Published on: October 17, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow
08:58

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow

Published on: October 17, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Clinical Trials
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for medical evidence.
  • Orthopedic implant comparisons often face unique challenges impacting study validity.
  • Bias can compromise the reliability of findings in orthopedic RCTs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify challenges in designing and conducting RCTs for orthopedic implants.
  • To propose solutions for mitigating bias in orthopedic implant research.
  • To enhance surgeons' ability to design and critically appraise orthopedic RCTs.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on RCT design and bias in orthopedic surgery.
  • Analysis of common challenges in orthopedic implant trials.
  • Discussion of strategies for bias reduction, including randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding.

Main Results:

  • RCTs are ideal for comparing orthopedic implants but are susceptible to bias.
  • Surgical techniques and implant variations introduce significant design challenges.
  • Methodological rigor is essential to ensure the validity of orthopedic RCTs.

Conclusions:

  • Addressing design and appraisal challenges is key to improving orthopedic implant research.
  • Enhanced understanding of RCT methodology will lead to more reliable evidence.
  • The review aims to improve the quality of evidence for orthopedic implant decision-making.