Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Live Cell Imaging of F-actin Dynamics via Fluorescent Speckle Microscopy (FSM)
Published on: August 5, 2009
Systematic and random errors in electronic speckle photography
Abstract:
Electronic speckle photography offers a simple and fast technique for measuring in-plane displacement fields in solid and fluid mechanics. Errors from undersampling, illumination divergence, and displacement magnitude have been analyzed and measured. The nature of the systematic error is such that a drift toward the closest integral pixel value is introduced. Because of the finite extent of the sensor area, considerable undersampling is tolerable before systematic errors occur. The random errors are mainly dependent on the effective ƒ-number of the imaging system and speckle decorrelation introduced by object displacement. When sampling at a rate of ~ 70% of the Nyquist frequency, we avoided systematic errors and minimized random errors.
Related Concept Videos
Random and Systematic Errors
Random and Systematic Errors
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...

