Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Cross-reactivity00:42

Cross-reactivity

Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Resident and Engrafting <i>E. coli</i> Populations Expand Through Dissimilar Pathways in the Inflamed Gut.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Geometric ordering in bacterial communities.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

An Escherichia coli Phosphotransferase System Modulates Methylglyoxal Resistance by Regulating Intracellular Potassium.

Molecular microbiology·2026
Same author

Fever enhances host bacterial defence while limiting mitochondrial damage.

Research square·2026
Same author

A phosphohistidine phosphatase promotes starvation survival by dephosphorylating nucleoside diphosphate kinase.

Cell reports·2026
Same author

Platelet factor 4 modulates endothelial cell antimicrobial activity to enhance bacterial clearance and improve sepsis outcomes.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Dual-Color Fluorescence Cross-Correlation Spectroscopy to Study Protein-Protein Interaction and Protein Dynamics in Live Cells
14:12

Dual-Color Fluorescence Cross-Correlation Spectroscopy to Study Protein-Protein Interaction and Protein Dynamics in Live Cells

Published on: December 11, 2021

Characterizing cross-talk in vivo avoiding pitfalls and overinterpretation.

Albert Siryaporn1, Mark Goulian

  • 1Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Methods in Enzymology
|October 16, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Investigating cross-talk between histidine kinases and response regulators in vivo is complex. This study explores methods to accurately measure and understand this regulatory cross-talk in cells.

More Related Videos

A Co-culture Method to Investigate the Crosstalk Between X-ray Irradiated Caco-2 Cells and PBMC
11:40

A Co-culture Method to Investigate the Crosstalk Between X-ray Irradiated Caco-2 Cells and PBMC

Published on: January 30, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Dual-Color Fluorescence Cross-Correlation Spectroscopy to Study Protein-Protein Interaction and Protein Dynamics in Live Cells
14:12

Dual-Color Fluorescence Cross-Correlation Spectroscopy to Study Protein-Protein Interaction and Protein Dynamics in Live Cells

Published on: December 11, 2021

A Co-culture Method to Investigate the Crosstalk Between X-ray Irradiated Caco-2 Cells and PBMC
11:40

A Co-culture Method to Investigate the Crosstalk Between X-ray Irradiated Caco-2 Cells and PBMC

Published on: January 30, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Histidine kinases and response regulators are key components of two-component signal transduction systems.
  • While in vitro studies show cross-talk between noncognate partners, its physiological relevance in vivo is often unclear.
  • These interactions are generally highly specific, making in vivo cross-talk rare and difficult to study.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the challenges in studying in vivo cross-talk between histidine kinases and response regulators.
  • To identify mechanisms that govern the specificity of these interactions.
  • To explore methods for detecting and analyzing cross-talk in wild-type organisms.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing transcriptional reporters to monitor gene expression changes indicative of cross-talk.
  • Employing in vivo DNA-binding assays to assess protein-DNA interactions.
  • Analyzing potential confounding factors from other regulatory circuits and suppressor mechanisms.

Main Results:

  • Cross-talk between noncognate histidine kinases and response regulators is often masked by cellular mechanisms.
  • Specific experimental conditions and reporter systems can reveal previously unobserved cross-talk events.
  • In vivo DNA-binding assays combined with transcriptional reporters offer a robust approach to study specificity.

Conclusions:

  • The specificity of histidine kinase-response regulator interactions is crucial for cellular function.
  • In vivo studies are essential to understand the physiological significance of cross-talk.
  • Careful experimental design is necessary to avoid misinterpretation of cross-talk data.