Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Catheter ablation of electrical storm in patients with structural heart disease
Marketa Kozeluhova1, Petr Peichl, Robert Cihak
1Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1958/9, Prague 4 140 21, Czech Republic. mrkz@ikem.cz
Insights
Catheter ablation effectively suppresses electrical storm (ES) acutely, offering life-saving benefits. Long-term, it prevents ventricular tachycardia recurrences in about half of patients with ES.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Electrical storm (ES) significantly worsens patient prognosis and can be life-threatening.
- Catheter ablation (CA) is a proposed treatment for ES, aiming to suppress ventricular arrhythmias.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of catheter ablation (CA) for acute and long-term suppression of electrical storm (ES).
Main Methods:
- Fifty patients with ES underwent catheter ablation (CA) using electroanatomical mapping.
- CA aimed to abolish all inducible ventricular arrhythmias.
- Patient outcomes were assessed during an 18-month follow-up.
Main Results:
- Catheter ablation (CA) acutely suppressed ES in 84% of patients.
- During follow-up, 48% of patients remained free of ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence.
- Recurrent ES despite CA was linked to increased mortality or need for heart transplantation.
Conclusions:
- Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective and often life-saving therapy for acute electrical storm (ES) suppression.
- Long-term, CA prevents VT recurrence in approximately 50% of treated patients.
Aims:
Electrical storm (ES) adversely affects prognosis of patients and may become a life-threatening event. Catheter ablation (CA) has been proposed for the treatment of ES. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy of CA ablation both in acute and long-term suppression of ES.
Methods And Results:
Fifty consecutive patients with coronary artery disease (38), idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (5), arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (6), and/or with combined aetiology (1) underwent CA for ES. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 29 ± 11%. All patients underwent electroanatomical mapping, and CA was performed to abolish all inducible ventricular arrhythmias. The ES was suppressed by CA in 84% of patients. During the follow-up of 18 ± 16 months, 24 patients had no recurrences of any ventricular tachycardia (VT; 48%). Repeated procedure was necessary to suppress the recurrent ES in 13 cases (26%). Statistical analysis revealed that low LVEF (22 ± 3 vs. 31 ± 12%; P < 0.001), increased LVend-diastolic diameter (72 ± 9.1 vs. 64 ± 8.9 mm; P = 0.0135), and renal insufficiency (P < 0.001) were the univariate predictors of early mortality or necessity for heart transplantation. Recurrence of ES despite previous CA procedure was associated with a higher risk of death or heart transplant during follow-up (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
Catheter ablation is effective in acute suppression of ES and often represents a life-saving therapy. In the long term, it prevents recurrences of any VT in about half of the treated patients.
More Related Videos
06:57Ablation of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia Using a Multipolar Catheter and 3-dimensional Mapping System for High-density Electro-anatomical Reconstruction
Published on: January 31, 2019
10:46Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
Published on: May 26, 2015
Related Concept Videos
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Electrophysiology of Normal Cardiac Rhythm