Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers01:13

Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers

In certain scenarios, in vitro dissolution tests can replace in vivo bioequivalence studies. This is particularly true when a drug product, though available in varying strengths, maintains proportional similarity in its active and inactive ingredients. In such cases, the need for in vivo bioequivalence studies for lower strength variants may be waived, provided dissolution tests and in vivo studies on the highest strength yield satisfactory results.Bioequivalence can be indicated through...
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Symptoms and subtypes of patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction - insights from the Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network.

Nature reviews. Urology·2026
Same author

What patients would have liked to have known in advance about physical function due to cancer treatment.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2026
Same author

Applying the Argument-Based Approach to Validation With Clinical Outcome Assessments: Strategies for Constructing a Rationale.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
Same author

Effective Scientific Presentations Across Formats: A Modern Guide for Science Trainees and Researchers.

Advances in social sciences research journal·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence and the future of patient-centered outcomes.

Journal of patient-reported outcomes·2025
Same author

Approaches to Addressing Pediatric Cancer Treatment Refusal Beyond Legal Action.

Pediatric blood & cancer·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management
08:01

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management

Published on: November 30, 2022

Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking.

Laura M Beskow1, Joëlle Y Friedman, N Chantelle Hardy

  • 1Center for Genome Ethics, Law and Policy, Duke Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America. laura.beskow@duke.edu

Plos One
|October 16, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Simplified biobanking consent forms are feasible. A concise, two-page form with optional detailed FAQs helps participants identify essential information, improving understanding and engagement in biobanking research.

More Related Videos

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

Biobanking of Human Aqueous and Vitreous Liquid Biopsies for Molecular Analyses
14:54

Biobanking of Human Aqueous and Vitreous Liquid Biopsies for Molecular Analyses

Published on: September 11, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management
08:01

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management

Published on: November 30, 2022

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

Biobanking of Human Aqueous and Vitreous Liquid Biopsies for Molecular Analyses
14:54

Biobanking of Human Aqueous and Vitreous Liquid Biopsies for Molecular Analyses

Published on: September 11, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Biobanking and Participant Consent
  • Health Literacy and Informed Consent
  • Regulatory Compliance in Research

Background:

  • Consent forms have become lengthy and difficult for participants to comprehend.
  • There is a need for simplified consent processes in biobanking.
  • Ethical and regulatory requirements must be met while improving accessibility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the feasibility of creating a simplified biobanking consent form.
  • To identify the minimum necessary information for ethical and regulatory compliance.
  • To gather preliminary data on participant comprehension of a simplified form.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a two-page consent form using plain-language principles.
  • Incorporated essential elements required by federal regulations and best practices.
  • Recruited diabetes patients and randomized them to read the simplified form (paper and electronic with FAQs).

Main Results:

  • Participants identified an average of 6.6 FAQ sentences as important.
  • A significant portion of participants did not highlight any FAQ sentences, indicating varying information needs.
  • The simplified form, with supplemental FAQs, appears to contain key information for most participants.

Conclusions:

  • Preliminary findings suggest the simplified form effectively conveys important information.
  • Combining concise forms with supplemental material can reduce complexity.
  • This approach can enhance participant understanding and engagement in biobanking.