Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Compartment Models: Two-Compartment Model

Compartment Models: Two-Compartment Model

The two-compartment model divides the body into central and peripheral compartments to account for varying blood perfusion rates among organs and tissues, affecting drug distribution. The central compartment includes blood and highly perfused tissues with rapid drug distribution, while the peripheral compartment contains tissues with slower drug distribution. After a single IV bolus dose, the drug concentration is high in plasma and low in tissues. The drug distribution between compartments...

Two-Compartment Open Model: Extravascular Administration

Two-Compartment Open Model: Extravascular Administration

The two-compartment model for extravascular administration represents a drug's absorption and distribution process. It features a central compartment, where the drug is first absorbed, and a peripheral compartment, which illustrates the drug's distribution throughout the body. The rate of change in drug concentration in the central compartment is calculated by three exponents: absorption, distribution, and elimination.
The absorption exponent (ka) indicates the speed at which the drug is...

Three-Compartment Open Model

Three-Compartment Open Model

The three-compartment open model is a pharmacokinetic model used to describe the distribution and elimination of drugs following extravascular administration. It comprises a central compartment representing the plasma and two peripheral compartments. The highly perfused peripheral compartment represents organs and tissues with a rich blood supply, such as the liver, kidneys, and lungs. The scarcely perfused peripheral compartment represents tissues with lower blood supply, such as adipose...

Assessment of Diffusion and Perfusion

Assessment of Diffusion and Perfusion

Understanding and evaluating diffusion and perfusion is critical in assessing a patient's respiratory and circulatory health. These processes play key roles in maintaining the body's internal environment, ensuring that tissues receive adequate oxygen while waste products are efficiently removed.
The Role of Diffusion in Respiration
Diffusion is the process by which molecules move from an area of higher concentration to an area of lower concentration. In the respiratory system, this principle...

Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models

Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models

Physiological pharmacokinetic models, often called flow-limited or perfusion models, typically assume a swift drug distribution between tissue and venous blood, creating a rapid drug equilibrium. This premise is based on the idea that drug diffusion is extremely fast, and the cell membrane presents no barrier to drug permeation. In this scenario, where no drug binding occurs, the drug concentration in the tissue equals that of the venous blood leaving the tissue. This greatly simplifies the...

Multicompartment Models: Overview

Multicompartment Models: Overview

Multicompartment models are mathematical constructs that depict how drugs are distributed and eliminated within the body. They segment the body into several compartments, symbolizing various physiological or anatomical areas connected through drug transfer processes such as absorption, metabolism, distribution, and elimination.
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Differentiation between normal and metastatic lymph nodes in patients with skin melanoma: Preliminary findings using a DIXON-based whole-body MRI approach.

European journal of radiology open·2024

Same author

Preclinical validation of the advection diffusion flow estimation method using computational patient specific coronary tree phantoms.

International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering·2023

Same author

Longitudinal changes in global structural brain connectivity and cognitive performance in former hospitalized COVID-19 survivors: an exploratory study.

Experimental brain research·2023

Same author

Synthetic MRI of Preterm Infants at Term-Equivalent Age: Evaluation of Diagnostic Image Quality and Automated Brain Volume Segmentation.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2020

Same author

Alterations in the fronto-limbic network and corpus callosum in borderline-personality disorder.

Brain and cognition·2019

Same author

Production and performance of bio-based mineral fertilizers from agricultural waste using ammonia (stripping-)scrubbing technology.

Waste management (New York, N.Y.)·2019

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Pulmonary Perfusion using Calibrated Arterial Spin Labeling

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Pulmonary Perfusion using Calibrated Arterial Spin Labeling

Published on: May 30, 2011

Error estimation for perfusion parameters obtained using the two-compartment exchange model in dynamic

R Luypaert¹, S Sourbron, S Makkat

¹Department of Radiology, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BEFY), Laarbeeklaan 101, B1090 Brussels, Belgium.

Physics in Medicine and Biology

|October 19, 2010

Summary

Simulations using the two-compartment exchange model (2CXM) with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data can assess result trustworthiness. This approach helps understand errors in hemodynamic parameter estimation from DCE-MRI exams.

More Related Videos

Phase-Resolved Functional Lung MRI for Pulmonary Ventilation and Perfusion (V/Q) Assessment

Phase-Resolved Functional Lung MRI for Pulmonary Ventilation and Perfusion (V/Q) Assessment

Published on: August 9, 2024

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of an Orthotopic Pancreatic Cancer Mouse Model

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of an Orthotopic Pancreatic Cancer Mouse Model

Published on: April 18, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Pulmonary Perfusion using Calibrated Arterial Spin Labeling

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Pulmonary Perfusion using Calibrated Arterial Spin Labeling

Published on: May 30, 2011

Phase-Resolved Functional Lung MRI for Pulmonary Ventilation and Perfusion (V/Q) Assessment

Phase-Resolved Functional Lung MRI for Pulmonary Ventilation and Perfusion (V/Q) Assessment

Published on: August 9, 2024

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of an Orthotopic Pancreatic Cancer Mouse Model

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of an Orthotopic Pancreatic Cancer Mouse Model

Published on: April 18, 2015

Area of Science:

Medical Imaging
Biophysics
Pharmacokinetics

Background:

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) enables quantification of tissue perfusion and vascularity.
The two-compartment exchange model (2CXM) is a common pharmacokinetic model used to analyze DCE-MRI data.
Understanding the reliability of parameters derived from 2CXM is crucial for accurate clinical interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the utility of 2CXM-based simulations for evaluating the trustworthiness of hemodynamic parameter estimations from DCE-MRI.
To assess the impact of instrumental factors on the accuracy of 2CXM-derived parameters.
To explore simulation-based methods for estimating errors in DCE-MRI analysis.

Main Methods:

Simulations were performed using the 2CXM framework with varying tissue properties and instrumental factors (sampling step, acquisition window, contrast-to-noise ratio).
Deviations from input hemodynamic quantities were calculated for reference and limit tissues.
A bootstrap simulation approach was employed to estimate errors on fitted parameters for individual DCE exams.

Main Results:

While specific measurement guidelines to guarantee ±20% accuracy were not derivable, simulations proved valuable for assessing expected error behavior.
Simulations offer a practical method for comparing different DCE-MRI measurement protocols and experimental setups.
A bootstrap simulation method provided useful error estimates for fitted parameters in individual DCE-MRI examinations.

Conclusions:

Simulation-based analysis of the 2CXM is a practical tool for understanding DCE-MRI data reliability and optimizing measurement protocols.
The findings support the use of simulations to evaluate the trustworthiness of hemodynamic parameters derived from DCE-MRI.
This approach aids in quantifying uncertainties associated with DCE-MRI parameter estimation.