Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
Trait Centrality01:21

Trait Centrality

Trait centrality refers to the degree to which a particular characteristic influences the overall impression of an individual. Some traits exert a disproportionately strong impact on perception, shaping how people interpret other attributes of a person. Solomon Asch first systematically studied this phenomenon in 1946.Asch’s Experiment on Trait CentralityAsch's seminal study demonstrated the centrality of certain traits through a controlled experiment. Participants were presented with a list of...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Implicit Personality Theories01:23

Implicit Personality Theories

Implicit personality theory explains how individuals make assumptions about the relationships between personality traits, behaviors, and character types. When people learn that someone possesses a particular trait, they tend to infer the presence of other related characteristics, forming a cohesive impression. This cognitive shortcut plays a crucial role in social interactions and interpersonal judgments.Central Traits and Their InfluenceSolomon Asch's seminal 1946 study highlighted the power...
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory01:20

Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory

Cognitive psychologist Richard Lazarus proposed the cognitive-mediational theory of emotions, which emphasizes how individuals' assessments of stressors significantly affect their experience of stress. According to Lazarus, the stress response is determined by a two-step appraisal process: primary appraisal and secondary appraisal. These cognitive appraisals help individuals evaluate the potential impact of a stressor and determine the adequacy of their coping resources.
Primary Appraisal:...
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Permission Paradox: Condoning Deception Can Promote Honesty in Young Children.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

Negative descriptive norms can influence young children's generosity even when positive descriptive norms do not.

Child development·2026
Same author

Reciprocity norms can promote dishonesty in children.

Child development·2026
Same author

Hiding discrimination in plain sight: The development of reasoning about disparate impact policies.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

Overheard evaluative comments can affect young children's effort.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

Reasoning about the merits of meritocracy.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Valence Effects in Reasoning About Evaluative Traits.

Gail D Heyman1, Jessica W Giles

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego.

Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (Wayne State University. Press)
|October 19, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Children and adults infer traits differently based on valence. Positive traits are seen as more stable and less malleable than negative ones across all age groups.

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Social Cognition
  • Trait Theory

Background:

  • Understanding how individuals reason about evaluative traits is crucial for developmental psychology.
  • Previous research has explored trait perception, but less is known about age-related differences in sensitivity to trait valence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate age-related reasoning about evaluative social and academic traits.
  • To determine if trait inferences are sensitive to the valence (positive vs. negative) of the traits across different age groups.

Main Methods:

  • Participants included three age groups: 7-8 year olds (N=34), 11-13 year olds (N=25), and adults (N=23).
  • Evaluated four aspects of trait beliefs: malleability, stability over time, origin (nature vs. nurture), and inference criterion.
  • Assessed how participants inferred traits based on social and academic characteristics of varying valence.

Main Results:

  • Participants across all age groups perceived positive traits as less malleable and more stable over time compared to negative traits.
  • A tendency to emphasize positive information decreased with age.
  • Positive influences (biological/environmental) were seen as more likely to override negative influences, and competence was more readily inferred from positive outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Reasoning about trait valence shows developmental trends, with younger children potentially emphasizing positive information more.
  • Despite age differences, a consistent bias exists across development, viewing positive traits as more inherent and stable than negative ones.
  • These findings highlight the pervasive influence of trait valence on social and academic inferences throughout development.