Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

An Affordable HIV-1 Drug Resistance Monitoring Method for Resource Limited Settings
Published on: March 30, 2014
Standard measures are inadequate to monitor pediatric adherence in a resource-limited setting
Alexandra D Müller1, Heather B Jaspan, Landon Myer
1Universitätsmedizin, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany. alexdmueller@gmail.com
Insights
Objective adherence measures like MEMS are costly and don't always reflect accurate pediatric antiretroviral treatment timing. Cheaper electronic monitoring is needed for resource-limited settings.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric infectious diseases
- Pharmacoeconomics
- Global health
Background:
- Accurate adherence monitoring is crucial for effective pediatric antiretroviral treatment (ART).
- Objective measures are often preferred but can be costly and complex.
- Subjective measures are simpler but may lack precision.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the utility and cost-effectiveness of objective and subjective adherence measures for pediatric ART.
- To evaluate the accuracy of pharmacy refill (PR), returned syrups (RS), caregiver self-report (3DR), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) against the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS).
Main Methods:
- A 1-month longitudinal study involving 53 caregiver-child dyads in a South African primary care facility.
- Comparison of adherence data from PR, RS, 3DR, and VAS with MEMS.
- Cost analysis of each adherence monitoring method.
Main Results:
- High adherence rates reported by VAS (100%), 3DR (100%), PR (100%), and RS (103%).
- MEMS indicated 92% of doses administered, but only 66% within the prescribed 12-hour interval.
- No significant correlation found between PR, RS, 3DR, VAS, and MEMS.
- MEMS was the most expensive adherence monitoring tool.
Conclusions:
- Subjective and pharmacy-based adherence measures do not accurately reflect the timing accuracy of pediatric ART doses.
- MEMS highlights significant deviations in dose timing, which requires better monitoring strategies.
- Development and accessibility of cost-effective electronic monitoring devices are essential for resource-limited settings.
Abstract:
This study aims to compare the use and cost of objective and subjective measures of adherence to pediatric antiretroviral treatment in a primary care facility in South Africa. In a 1-month longitudinal study of 53 caregiver-child dyads, pharmacy refill (PR), measurement of returned syrups (RS), caregiver self-report (3DR) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were compared to Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS). Adherence was 100% for both VAS and 3DR; by PR and RS 100% and 103%, respectively. MEMS showed that 92% of prescribed doses were administered, but only 66% of these within the correct 12-hourly interval. None of the four measures correlated significantly with MEMS. MEMS data suggest that timing of doses is often more deviant from prescribed than expected and should be better addressed when monitoring adherence. Of all, MEMS was by far the most expensive measure. Alternative, cheaper electronic devices need to be more accessible in resource-limited settings.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism

